Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca
    Posts
    7,602
    vCash
    1000

    Missouri Representative proposes tax on “violent” video games

    A Representative of Missouri, Republican Diane Franklin of Camdenton, is calling for a sales tax on violent video games following the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut. “Violent,” in this instance, really doesn’t mean what you think it does. From the proposed bill: “the term ‘violent video game’ means a video or computer game that has received a rating from the Entertainment Software Rating Board of Teen, Mature, or Adult Only”

    That means that , if successfully passed, Teen-rated games like The Sims 3, Starcraft 2, EVE Online and Tropico 4 would all be taxed in Missouri on account of how unrepentantly violent they are. Seriously, if my eyes rolled any harder it would cause permanent damage.

    If passed, the bill would impose a 1% sales tax to violent games, to be used to finance mental health programs and law enforcement measures to prevent mass shootings. No other form of media is being targeted by the proposal.
    Link


    This is just pathetic.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRuckus View Post
    You can't spell Worley without W.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Posts
    64,375
    vCash
    500
    That's really gonna make a difference!




    At least the tax would go to something decent, I guess.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    27,846
    vCash
    500
    Someone is trying hard to be a champion of the moment.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    10,695
    vCash
    1500
    The Sims?

    Oh jeez.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kris Medlen's Bed
    Posts
    10,341
    vCash
    1500
    Muck Fizzou


    The Cult of Gattis

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,821
    vCash
    1620
    Lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    65,503
    vCash
    1500
    I love it when the GOP trumpets themselves as the party of personal responsibility like this…

    Blame the shooter, nonsense, blame the video game.
    Member of the Owlluminati!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,327
    vCash
    1500
    So stupid. Do these people not realize that there is a freakin' rating system for a reason?! *rage ensuing*

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    8,669
    vCash
    1500
    Kill everything

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx
    Posts
    22,621
    vCash
    1500
    Why not put the tax on guns?

    The PSD's Official Steve Nash Support Crew, Members: R4L

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx
    Posts
    22,621
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    I love it when the GOP trumpets themselves as the party of personal responsibility like this…

    Blame the shooter, nonsense, blame the video game.
    Well in the GOP's defense, I doubt a whole lot of true conservatives would agree with something like that.

    The PSD's Official Steve Nash Support Crew, Members: R4L

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    30
    vCash
    1500
    Might as well tax all videogames so they can put money towards video game addiction prevention for those people who are beyond addicted to videogames.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca
    Posts
    7,602
    vCash
    1000
    My biggest problem is that older generations have no understanding of video games, the internet & technology in general.

    So trying to moderate or control something they can't grasp/understand is plain laughable.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRuckus View Post
    You can't spell Worley without W.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    30
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Infamous916 View Post
    My biggest problem is that older generations have no understanding of video games, the internet & technology in general.

    So trying to moderate or control something they can't grasp/understand is plain laughable.
    Surely some of them downloaded game apps onto their smartphones.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, Ca
    Posts
    7,602
    vCash
    1000
    In the wake over the Obama administration’s pledge to further “study the link between video games and violent behavior,” other lawmakers want to go one step further, and a pair of new bills have been introduced around the country to do just that.

    First we have the state legislature of Missouri where Rep. Diane Franklin (D) is proposing a new 1% tax on violent video games, meaning any game rated Teen, Mature or Adults Only would be elligable. Yes, that apparently includes you, Rock Band, Skate and Forza. The funds from the tax would go to “the treatment of mental health conditions associated with exposure to violent video games.”

    “History shows there is a mental health component to these shootings,” Franklin said to the Associated Press.

    So, what she’s saying is that it’s actually video games that are causing diagnosable mental health problems in their players. That’s an argument I’ve never actually heard said out loud before, and there’s probably a reason for that. The ESA immediately came out with a counter-statement saying that taxing First Amendment protected free speech is wrong, and with the video game industry’s recent Supreme Court win, it’s hard to imagine this bill will get anywhere close to becoming an implemented law. But the fact that elected officials can simply declare that video games cause mental disorders without hard evidence is rather terrifying.

    Now we move up to the national level where Rep. Jim Matheson (D-Utah) is proposing a new bill in the House that would ”prohibit the sales and rentals of adult-rated video games to minors.” The bill also calls for a warning label on games that says “exposure to violent video games has been linked to aggressive behavior.” Neither of these are new ideas. The label has been proposed in the House before, and several states have tried to pass laws that make it illegal for retailers to sell violent games to minors. Many do not appear to know that nearly all retailers do not sell M-rated games to minors, and cashiers that do so risk losing their jobs. For the record, none of these proposals have ended up becoming law at the state or national level.

    In short, there’s a push to make video games seem like they’re as dangerous as something like cigarettes, which are also taxed, labeled and illegal to sell to minors. The difference being that cigarettes are demonstrably killing thousands upon thousands of people a year, where a proven link between video games and murder is fictional, despite what these lawmakers are saying. Even the White House says that such a declaration cannot be made about video games, hence why they’re funding new studies into the matter in the first place, because the evidence just isn’t there.

    Fortunately, despite all the huff and puff of lawmakers, video games seem content to bask in the glow of well-earned First Amendment protection. And so long as M-rated games are not directly marketed or sold to minors, I don’t see why the industry needs to change much at all. Except maybe to stop packaging butchered bikini zombie torso statues with games.
    Link

    The saga continues....
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRuckus View Post
    You can't spell Worley without W.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •