What I dont understand is where you saw anything that has lead you to believe he is a #1? His best season was last year and he didnt play a full load and his stats were still pretty average (unless you count the year he played 19 games). Your right I quoted you wrong, but he has never shown he could be a true number 1.....or healthy. There.
If average means a legitimate number 1 to you then ok, good luck. It doesnt to me. Goaltending has been key to the last...how many cup wins or great playoff runs? Harding has NEVER put up these kind of stats a full seasons length. If he gets the chance and does it this year then we have a different story next year. But he never has. So Backstrom stays as insurance.
Im not saying im confident in Backstrom, because im not. But im much more confident in Backstrom and his stats and record than I am Hackett or Kuemper. Im not arguing for Backstrom here, im arguing against Harding being a true #1 right now and it being a smart idea to bring up a kid from the AHL who needs longer there. So the stats comparison thing is a moot point. Its true Harding was suppose to be the #1 here eventually, but he has had many setbacks with injuries and he is still only what 28? Thats pretty young to be a starting NHL goalie. So give him this year with Backstrom as insurance, or vice versa, and see what happens. But you dont trade away your true starter just because you can get a prospect.
Yes a waste, you trade half your goalie duo for a prospect or pick that might not even pan out. The waste being you would have to have Harding play 20 more games and risk having a kid who should be in the AHL be a backup. Its a complete waste of what Backstrom could bring to the team. Yes we get nothing if we let him walk, except his play this year which will probably be as good as/better then Harding and for sure better then Hackett or Kuemper would be at this level.
Again I agree with Roloson but its another different issue and I dont know why we are arguing about this it has nothing to do with Backstrom/Harding. And we get under the cap at the expense of Jake Dowell, who should not even be on an NHL team. Or from Kassian. As a matter of fact according to capgeek we are under the cap so it doesnt matter (our payroll is above but not our cap).
Its not what you said but I also didnt say you said that I asked you if you really thought he could come over and be a #1. Your words sort of implied that I forgot about him and not to count him out coming over from Europe because thats what Backstrom did and he surprised everyone and became a #1. Implying Gustafsson could do the same.
This all changes if one of two things happen. The Wild arent in playoff contention come deadline or Harding is playing well has taken the number one spot and someone blows us out of the water with a high end prospect or high pick (1st rounder) and a new backup for Harding.






Reply With Quote


