Yes, because Dwight's dream is to play in Sacramento and sign a long term extension there. And it's the Kings' dream to trade a talent like Cousins for a half year rental.
Anybody but Landy!
Kings don't do rentals.
i still think he either goes to brooklyn or dallas.....cuz i don't see him as a laker after this season......
If you want to humiliate him, trade him to Charlotte.
I guess I'm in the minority here, but this sounds like a good idea to me. In theory. It's looking like the Lakers and Dwight don't fit, and contrary to what Sacramento says, I don't think they want Cousins there if they can get equal value for him. It seems like this is something that would benefit both teams.
But, the whole Dwight being a free agnet thing is again a sticking issue. Based on his past comments, he's not staying in Sacramento. It would be incredibly stupid for Sac to trade Cousins for a half season of Dwight. That's the reason this won't work.
So the goal is to trade a primadonna for ANOTHER documented headcase?
LoLakers won't do it. They've got enough issues.
Broncos be like:
how about trade dwight to philly for Bynum and pick
Kings of New York
WELCOME TO PLANET ORANGE & BLUE
All great things come to an end...even in basketball -Me
That's too much for an half of a season injured rental!
Trade Dwight,Salmons&LA's PG to Nets, Cousins&Wallace to Lakers and Lopez,filler&3picks to Kings..
Aski, Delfino, Montejuinas, Royce White and a 1st for D12. If you're LA be happy anybody gave you anything.