
Originally Posted by
Knowledge
One of my problem with your opinion when it comes to Cena is that you have no set criteria. It is established that Cena is one of the biggest money makers in the history of the wwe, that he sells the most merchandise of anyone in his era, and that he draws the best ratings (IN ALL AGE GROUPS) of anyone in his era yet you don't acknowledge it. He has also succeeded as a face and a heel.
In comparison, a guy like Punk, who manages to move merchandise, but has failed to consistently draw ratings in big time-slots and can't sell ppvs on his own, has saved the wwe? How can you save the wwe when the majority of people don't tune in to see him? He is a great heel, but has flopped every time he has been face.
Same with HHH, he was never the featured draw or guy of his era, yet he is ahead of Cena? How can you be all time top 10 and not have been a big draw?
No matter how you feel about his gimmick, Cena is the most successful superstar of his era. I mean is everything strictly based on in ring ability? Is it mic skills? Or is it your ability to draw? I think it should be all three, but your ability to draw and how over you are is the most important aspect of any performer.