| Sponsored Links |
|
|
what ??? smitch made calderon, bosh and ford better players![]()
then why wasnt calderon able to become a better defender ? why was tj ford so selfish ?
why did bosh become a black hole ? the ball stuck in bosh's hand and he always took contested jumpers rather then trying to go to the hole strong like he use to do when he was younger... under sam he became the jab/contested jumper king!
smitch catered to bosh the way he is talking about b.c catering to bargs and really didnt use bosh correctly imo. why is it that bosh hated playing the 5 here but is more then happy to oblige when the heat need him to play the 5?
imagine bosh moved to the 5 and bargs played his more natural position at the 4 along side him. we all know bosh is the better rebounder and defender in the post so why not ? maybe that would have worked better then having bargs try and play the 5 and 3 when we all knew that he is a finess 4..
plus smitch was whiny, he had terrible body language, he didnt carry himself well with the media, he kept short leashes on young players, and he was def extreamly lucky to have coached a decent roster in a very very very week atlantic division at the time.
Last edited by smith&wesson; 01-03-2013 at 07:17 PM.
I guess you will find what you are looking for. It's not hard to see that Smitch did little for the team or for any individual players. That's not arrogance, that's just observation. I mean seriously, the team sucked and was backsliding for most of his tenure. It's not "pretending to have knowledge" lol when everyone knew his playbook was dead simple and no players really developed under him. What did he really do? Run ISOs for Bosh? Get Jamario Moon and TJ Ford to take ill-advised 3 pointers? The team was a mess and went nowhere after 2007. The leaders on the team brought their skills to the team, that's why we saw improvement in 2007. The young players did little developing, whether we're talking about Joey Graham, Rafer Alston, MoPete, or Andrea Bargnani. That shouldn't be news to anyone. He depended on motivation, not ball IQ. You can only learn so much from a coach like that.
That wasn't the point of the post.
But come to think of it, you guys who claim to know that coaches let Bargnani do nothing are the ones pretending to be witnesses to things you don't know about. You don't know what Triano or Casey or Maurizio or Colangelo did or didn't do behind closed doors when dealing with Bargnani.
fyi backsliding - that's what we've been doing ever since he left. so to give him zero credit when we had our best results under his watch is pathetic.
raps in 2006-2007: 47-35
raps in 2007-2008: 41-41
WOW. what a backslide that is.
and Raps since - roughly 100 games under .500
LOLOLOL
Last edited by Jamiecballer; 01-03-2013 at 07:54 PM.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
until mitchell we were built for the playoffs
afterwards we were built for rebuilding. theres a difference
Yeah Sam really cuddled Bargnani
when GM bryan colangelo pulled the Jermaine O'Neal trade, who do you think had a say in it? Sam Mitchell, and BC listened and pulled the trigger knowing that this would mean another 2 years of Bargnani on the bench, even though he already spent his rook and sophomore season on the bench, so if JO filled out then that would mean Sam Mitchell would've had Bargnani 4 years on the bench. Is that cuddling your 1st overall pick as Sam Mitchell makes it out to be.
I remember a lot of us wanted Sam Mitchell to stop putting Bargnani under the bus? Because that is what "Smitch" does. He never liked rookies and he gave them a hard time, like he did with Jose Calderon
This more sounds like Sam Mitchell making excuses and subtly blaming Bargnani for his failures. It would make sense if Sam Mitchell said that about Bargnani now, but to say that he had to cuddle Bargnani during his tenure is a lie and an excuse
| Sponsored Links |
|
|