Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    anywhere USA
    Posts
    3,867

    Non-playoff teams draft order set

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...l-draft-order/

    1. Chiefs (2-14)

    2. Jaguars (2-14)

    3. Raiders (4-12)

    4. Eagles (4-12)

    5. Lions (4-12)

    6. Browns (5-11)

    7. Cardinals (5-11)

    8. Bills (6-10)

    9. Jets (6-10)

    10. Titans (6-10)

    11. Chargers (7-9)

    12. Dolphins (7-9)

    13. Buccaneers (7-9)

    14. Panthers (7-9)

    15. Saints (7-9)

    16. Rams (7-8-1)

    17. Steelers (8-8)

    18. Cowboys (8-8)

    19. Giants (9-7)

    20. Bears (10-6)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,390
    oh yay a top 5 pick

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,957
    Quote Originally Posted by UofAZ420 View Post
    oh yay a top 5 pick
    Another way to look at it is that both the Lions and Eagles have a lot of talent to be getting a top five pick in the mix. I don't think we'll see either in the top 10 the year after.
    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
    —Arthur Schopenhauer (German philosopher, 1788-1860)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Coral Springs, FL
    Posts
    13,471
    love being in the top 10

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,957
    Quote Originally Posted by utl768 View Post
    love being in the top 10
    Didnt work out too well last time. I feel your pain.
    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
    —Arthur Schopenhauer (German philosopher, 1788-1860)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    11,585


    I'm just glad that we don't have to trade our #1 pick this year.
    "Why can't we tell the world that [as the Raiders' coach] you refused to play games in the segregated South, holding out to the point where they were canceled?' And he would stop me dead in my tracks and say, 'Hey, kid -- I didn't do it for publicity. I did it because it was right.' "

  7. #7
    Aust's Avatar
    Aust is offline BUTLER!!!! / DOWN 25!!!!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Definitely somewhere
    Posts
    24,219
    Too bad for those teams in need of a QB, this is a horrible QB draft.
    (2/1/2015) (2/5/2017)

    HOLY ****



  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    6,596
    So the Rams get the 16th and 32nd overall picks, good for them.
    Reading the NFL rule book like:


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Central VA
    Posts
    10,690
    Quote Originally Posted by Austeezy View Post
    Too bad for those teams in need of a QB, this is a horrible QB draft.
    Yea.... Yuck


    YOU JUST MADE THE LIST!!!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    16,513
    Quote Originally Posted by IHateTheSkins View Post
    So the Rams get the 16th and 32nd overall picks, good for them.
    haha
    2014 Adopt-A-Lion: Golden Tate

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    52,937
    sucks that getitng the number one pick is usually a sign of hope that a franchise savior is coming, but this year its trash
    30 Team Stadium Checklist: 10 to go

    1) Yankees 2) Orioles 3) Rays 4) Red Sox 5) Mets 6) Braves 7) Phillies 8) Nationals 9) Marlins 10) Pirates 11) Padres 12) Astros 13) Mariners 14) Twins 15) Cubs 16) White Sox 17) Cardinals 18) Indians 19) Tigers 20) Royals 21) Reds

  12. #12
    subroc Guest
    The last 4 years the #1 overall selection was a QB.

    Will a QB be selected #1 overall or will it be another position?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    15,120
    Someone will gamble on Geno Smith thinking Cam Newton/RGIII and will fail miserably...


    👑

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,164
    I like this draft to be honest. There is a lot of depth. If this was 2008 and rookie contracts weren't capped I would be pissed, but you can get solid talent at a reasonable price in this draft.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •