Burleson wants to retire a Lion and willing to work financially to do so

[whooligun]

I want to retire a Lion too. I'll play for the league minimum. I'm sure I can line up incorrectly, make false starts, drop passes then get hurt too!

[gowman]

His value is just as great off the field as it is on the field. they need to keep him around

[Lionsfanfromsac]

I want to retire a Lion too. I'll play for the league minimum. I'm sure I can line up incorrectly, make false starts, drop passes then get hurt too!

Good to have you back whoo

[whooligun]

Good to have you back whoo

[Pillsberry99]

I want burr back too, he's got some needed swag, broyles could look up to him and cj making him better, burr could also do a better job to Titus keeping him humble, I don't mind Titus wanting to win and being pissed off about his performance but he needs to get his **** right just like the jeezy song, get right mah niggah!

[whooligun]

If Broyles comes back healthy, having CJ/Broyles/Bur is a pretty awesome receiving threat. If Grew learns how to catch, or Schef turns into a more reliable blocker, then all we need is an O-lineman and a speed back and we have nothing to worry about on offense.

If would be really nice to focus 80% of our offseason efforts on the D.

Bring Nate back!

[ahoda]

No thanks. I didn't want him back after the 2011 season and I definitely don't want him back for 2013.

[whooligun]

Even at a cheap salary?

[****ed in DET]

The only way I would want Burr back is if there is not a better option and/or if he's very cheap.

[madhador]

If Broyles comes back healthy, having CJ/Broyles/Bur is a pretty awesome receiving threat. If Grew learns how to catch, or Schef turns into a more reliable blocker, then all we need is an O-lineman and a speed back and we have nothing to worry about on offense.

If would be really nice to focus 80% of our offseason efforts on the D.

Bring Nate back!

This 100%, if Bur means what he says, come back on the cheap and there should be no issue with it what so ever. Even at his age/skill set decline, while not a game changer, should make a reliable impact and leadership is much needed.

[ahoda]

Even at a cheap salary?

Even at league minimum. Also, I don't see him settling for that either. He's saying what he should be saying for a guy who knows he most likely will be cut.

[whooligun]

Even at league minimum. Also, I don't see him settling for that either. He's saying what he should be saying for a guy who knows he most likely will be cut.

Maybe you're right. I just think that our 3rd receiver should be a veteran with great hands and route running ability, and if Nate is available for cheap, he already knows the system. That way the FO can focus on D. The less they have to think, the better lol.

[JWO35]

We have bunch of slot guys and no legit #2 IMO. Young, Burleson, and Broyles all slot guys in my opinion.... But I'm not saying go out and draft Robert Woods. But we should look into free agency for a WR.

[JWO35]

We have bunch of slot guys and no legit #2 IMO. Young, Burleson, and Broyles all slot guys in my opinion.... But I'm not saying go out and draft Robert Woods. But we should look into free agency for a WR.

[driz]

With the ASSORTMENT of players with absolutely horrible personal behavior issues, on-field fighting, etc. losing your most vocal veteran leader would be ridiculous. He CAN contribute greatly, and coming at a discount?? They should be all over it.

What are the odds Broyles ever comes back to be anything like people thought he could be?? They're going to need Nate on the field and off.