Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,940
    vCash
    1500

    Which player would get you any other player in trade?

    I think only 2 guys. but if those two teams trading with each other I dont think they would do the trade. I think Trout and Kershaw are the only 2 players than any team would trade any one of their players straight up for. Agree/ disagree or add your own.

    I think Dodgers wouldnt trade Kershaw straight up for Trout because we have Kemp. Angles wont trade Trout for Kershaw because they are hoping he becomes Kemp if not better all around. Other players like Verlander I think Tigers would trade him straight up for either.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,392
    vCash
    1500
    Any one gets traded for trout.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,436
    vCash
    1500
    The Angels won't trade Mike Trout because they hope he becomes Matt Kemp? No, the Angels won't trade Mike Trout because they hope he becomes Mickey Mantle.
    We're better than you
    And we know it


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    In the gym
    Posts
    2,343
    vCash
    1500
    Stanton...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    37,013
    vCash
    1000
    Trout

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    North Shore
    Posts
    3,900
    vCash
    1500
    There's a few. Kershaw, Trout, Stanton and Harper would top my list.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    16,961
    vCash
    1500
    Top and probably finish the list, and Kershaw might not even be on there.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Waterloo
    Posts
    9,076
    vCash
    1500
    Trout and Harper. No Stanton- Marlins would trade him for either of those other two on the merit of lower service time.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,477
    vCash
    1500
    Trout and Verlander.
    Favourite Teams:

    Boston Red Sox: 46-52, games this week vs. Blue Jays (4), Rays (3)
    Indianapolis Colts: Good draft and off-season so far.
    Looking for new NBA team to cheer for
    Ottawa Senators: 37-31-14, season over, free agency begins this week.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Jordan
    Posts
    33,947
    vCash
    1500
    The only answer is Trout. At this present time there is no logical way the Angels trade him. Kershaw can happen, even with how good he is. Case in point, Dodgers would trade him for Trout.

    Chicago Bears #23
    Kyle "Cheetah" Fuller

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Caracas - Venezuela
    Posts
    3,845
    vCash
    1500
    Would Harper be traded for Trout? I think they both work as the answer.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    The Heart of Long Island
    Posts
    7,312
    vCash
    1500
    Stras?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    8,788
    vCash
    1500
    A bunch of you didn't understand the question and listed multiple people. The question asked for 1 player and that answer is Trout. The reason is he's a superstar player already and will be under team control for so long. Other superstars are already making a lot of money and are not as good of a value as Trout is.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kris Medlen's Bed
    Posts
    10,286
    vCash
    1500
    Only Trout. Harper or Stanton wouldn't get Trout so it's Trout.


    The Cult of Gattis

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kris Medlen's Bed
    Posts
    10,286
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by MetsFanatic19 View Post
    Stras?
    Too big of an injury risk. He wouldn't even be traded for his own teammate.


    The Cult of Gattis

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •