Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Who

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Graham

    13 56.52%
  • Gronk

    10 43.48%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 45
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Posts
    88,124
    vCash
    1777

    Graham Or Gronk. Who would you take going forward?

    Vote.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Posts
    88,124
    vCash
    1777
    edit nvm
    Last edited by Norm; 02-19-2014 at 12:08 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    34,949
    vCash
    1500
    I mean if we were to discount injury histories, it's an obvious no-brainer. However, Gronk just seems incapable of staying healthy recently so I can't blame anyone for picking Graham for that reason.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Posts
    88,124
    vCash
    1777
    Quote Originally Posted by kozelkid View Post
    I mean if we were to discount injury histories, it's an obvious no-brainer. However, Gronk just seems incapable of staying healthy recently so I can't blame anyone for picking Graham for that reason.
    I never said they were healthy. I said who people would take.

    I said Graham, but I guess I'm too dumb for PSD because of that.


    Maybe he meant in Madden with injuries off?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    10,438
    vCash
    1000
    Graham solely because of injuries.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    7,555
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by kozelkid View Post
    I mean if we were to discount injury histories, it's an obvious no-brainer. However, Gronk just seems incapable of staying healthy recently so I can't blame anyone for picking Graham for that reason.
    Pretty much this.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    2,082
    vCash
    1500
    Gronk has had back, forearm, and knee surgeries and he's only 24. Usually a red flag there, although talent wise they're pretty equal when healthy. Gronk is also 3 years younger so this is tougher than you would think, I'd probably say that this is a draw to be honest.

    THANK YOU DANNY B #48

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,410
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by NormSized View Post
    I just asked 5 people in the mock off season, they all said Graham.

    But be careful.

    If you say Graham you are too dumb for PSD.

    http://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sho...2#post27997402
    still say healthy gronk over jimmy graham any day.


    Edit: curious to see where i said you were too dumb for psd if your refering to me saying jimmy graham is 2nd best TE? unless it was the post that got removed for insult didn't see what that person said.
    Last edited by BoSox47; 02-19-2014 at 12:00 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Posts
    88,124
    vCash
    1777
    Quote Originally Posted by BoSox47 View Post
    still say healthy gronk over jimmy graham any day.


    Edit: curious to see where i said you were too dumb for psd if your refering to me saying jimmy graham is 2nd best TE? unless it was the post that got removed for insult didn't see what that person said.
    Wasn't saying healthy. I'd take Gronk if you can guarantee health. Wasn't what I was asking. This is the NFL not Madden 'chise with injuries off.

    And yes it was removed. It's funny because he was backwards on the issue but he mocked me.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    All states
    Posts
    415
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by NormSized View Post
    I just asked 5 people in the mock off season, they all said Graham.

    But be careful.

    If you say Graham you are too dumb for PSD.

    http://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sho...2#post27997402
    Really? Then I guess those five people as well as everybody on this thread are "too stupid for PSD". You might want to re-word your topic.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Gronk simply due to the fact that when he's healthy he's literally uncoverable

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Posts
    88,124
    vCash
    1777
    Quote Originally Posted by PowerHouse View Post
    Really? Then I guess those five people as well as everybody on this thread are "too stupid for PSD". You might want to re-word your topic.
    That's what someone told me when I said Graham over Gronk broseph.

    That's why I made this thread. But the post is deleted now.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Posts
    88,124
    vCash
    1777
    Quote Originally Posted by Superdude View Post
    Gronk simply due to the fact that when he's healthy he's literally uncoverable
    Cough. pats fan. Cough.




    He's never healthy. If you literally had to pick one going forward tomorrow on, it would be impossible for me to risk it on Gronk getting healthy again.


    I don't see the logic in it. Even if Gronk is "better"

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,437
    vCash
    1500
    Gronk is a better TE IMO but has injury issues. Give me Graham.
    2014 Adopt-A-Lion: Golden Tate

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,453
    vCash
    1000
    Jimmy Graham is more or a receiver than a tight end. There is also the health of Gronk.

    They are on par with their receiving skills I would even give the edge to Graham.

    Gronk is/was a better blocker.

    Right now verdict: Graham

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •