Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    2,576

    sox looking for upgrade over salty?

    “With Saltalamacchia, I’ve heard this from executives of other teams: They say they think that the Red Sox will be looking for an upgrade at that position, possibly even before the trade deadline at some point. They feel like, given the money that they’re paying him, he’s got to perform better than how he’s been performing at the beginning of this year.
    http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/bos...medium=twitter

    ryan lavarnway?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    5,393
    There aren't many realistically attainable upgrades over Salty, IMO. Key word, attainable.
    Perfection.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    13,402
    "They say they think..." is code for "I talked to a guy in another FO who doesn't think much of Salty... and I gotta meet a deadline..." I'm not much of a Salty fan but consider these numbers:

    Career: .238/.303/.419
    2011: .238/.288/.450
    2012: .222/.288/.454
    2013: .232/.321/.435

    His 2013 numbers are not much to talk about BUT they are right in line with what he's done for his career and for his days in a Sox uniform. Rivals might think that they should get more for their money (they're right) but the dude splitting time with David Ross is exactly what he's always been. His HRs tend to come in little bunches so 3HR in April is not too far off. On the positive side his BB rate is up, ultimately producing a career best 101 OPS+.

    I don't love the numbers but Salty is having, by his standards, a banner year and to have expected something different was to go searching for fool's gold. I guess what I mean to say by all this is that the performance has not caught the Sox by surprise no matter what unnamed source someone "quoted" in an article.

    While I like Lavarnway's potential, Farrell didn't give him a chance in his brief chance last weekend. Lavarnway is hitting pretty well at PAW (.313/.433/.438) and has thrown out 44% of base stealers yet could not find his way into the game even to PH during a four game set with HOU that the Sox won by 4+ runs each day. All that speaks volumes to what they consider his readiness.
    Last edited by RedSoxtober; 05-01-2013 at 03:07 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    I'm not fan of Salty for a number of reasons, but either you go for a better glove or a better bat. Better at both? That's killer expensive.

    I think Ross should get 1/5 of the job from Salty - IE whichever pitcher is working least well with Salty. It would help the D, and getting less of a load might keep Salty's bat fresher in the 2nd half.

    At the deadline I'd making inquires of Cleveland. But be prepared to walk away unhappy on that....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Quote Originally Posted by RedSoxtober View Post
    All that speaks volumes to what they consider his readiness.
    Or it speaks to the Manager not wanting to mess with the wa/sangfroid of the team for the sake of one game.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    13,402
    Interesting read on Lavarnway from ProJo...

    All that, however, doesn’t mean there was nothing encouraging about the move. It was clear from the start that Lavarnway was serving as a roster placeholder, but the catcher earned that brief promotion because of a solid start with the PawSox — one that, he said, has him “getting back to being myself at the plate.”

    The implication, obviously, is that there was a time when Lavarnway wasn’t feeling like himself. It wasn’t just the stretch run of 2012, when he struggled mightily at the major-league level. It was a tough stretch that lasted most of the season, even as he managed to hit .295 with a .376 on-base percentage at Pawtucket.

    Lavarnway characterized the problem as an inability to make adjustments in the middle of an at-bat.

    “When I’m at my best, I am my own best hitting coach. I can make pitch-to-pitch adjustments during the at-bat and not have to come back to the dugout and waste an at-bat,” Lavarnway said.

    That wasn’t the case last year.

    “It was the first time that that had ever happened,” he said. “I was in unknown territory. I was searching for something and trying something new every day. There was no continuity.”

    What sparked Lavarnway’s turnaround? A visit from his past, carefully logged on the computer of hitting coach Dave Joppie.

    “I have a data base of stuff, with midseason and end-of-season evaluations,” said Joppie, whose work with Lavarnway dates all the way back to the fall instructional league in 2009. “I actually pulled those up off my computer, printed them out, gave them to him, sat down with him and we went through it step by step.”
    “We busted out what he had had in the logs of his computer from 2010, 2011 — what we were working on then, how we had progressed,” Lavarnway said. “He had taken notes, and that was helpful to see what I was thinking when I was at my best a couple of years ago and trying to get back into it.”

    Lavarnway has gotten back to the same pregame routine he used with Joppie when he started his breakout 2011 season in Portland. He’s also found a way to straddle the line of, in his own words, “being aggressive and being disciplined in my approach at the same time.”

    Joppie views that as simply being prepared to hit right away.

    “Probably the biggest thing with him is making sure he has the mindset of being ready to hit when he steps in the box, right from the 0-0 count,” Joppie said. “That’s something that he has done, instead of feeling his way through an at-bat, especially the first one. It allows him to be in position to recognize pitches better.”

    Case in point: Lavarnway’s first at-bat for the PawSox on Monday night. Instead of settling into the game and the at-bat, Lavarnway got a first pitch up in the zone and lined it into center for a base hit.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    31,410
    Salty to me is a pretty bad defensive player. If you're bad defensive catcher you better put up good offensive numbers. The last two years he has put up average offensive production at best. Most of his production comes from homeruns, and without looking it up it seems to me they come in short stretches with the bulk of games he's not much of a factor.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Quote Originally Posted by RedSoxtober View Post
    Interesting read on Lavarnway from ProJo...
    That's what I kept saying last year. He's not himself at the plate and he's getting too much coaching - let him relax.

    Salty at his best can be good defensively (if that arm is on that is), but at his worst he's bad. Lavarnway is already a steadier defensive catcher than Salty.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    15,458
    Please lord, let this be true.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Boston/Florida
    Posts
    8,834
    Im all for trading Salty. But Who's really out there tho for an upgrade?
    Clay Buchholz: 6-0, ERA 1.01 / Jon Lester: 4-0 , 3.11

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,543
    Quote Originally Posted by Celtic AL View Post
    Im all for trading Salty. But Who's really out there tho for an upgrade?
    I wouldn't say the upgrade comes necessarily from trading Salty for a better catcher. It's more addition by subtraction. Trading Salty for a prospect or maybe a bullpen piece and allowing Lavarnaway to take his spot would be an instant improvement in my mind. Lavarnaway would get to learn from a very good game caller in Ross and even with a straight platoon, Lavarnaway would hopefully get enough reps to stay in rhythm. It would also likely help Ross's bat as well. I think the defensive improvement goes without saying. As some have already mentioned, Salty is far too inconsistent defensively.

    -mooz

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Wethersfield/Storrs, CT
    Posts
    7,231
    Please take him out of my life

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,744
    Hope this is true. Catching is a weak spot for this team.
    Favourite Teams:

    Boston Red Sox: 27-17
    Indianapolis Colts: Decent draft, no new wide reciever though.
    Detroit Pistons: Looking forward to the draft and whoever the new coach will be
    Ottawa Senators: Down 2 to 1 to Pittsburgh, Game 4 on Wednesday Night, Game 5 on Friday Night and Game 6 on Sunday Night (If necessary)

    Beautiful:


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,878
    Im really just whatever on this. I never thought Salty was going to be an amazing catcher. I think he's pretty average. I hate that he strikes out a lot. I look around the league at potential replacement catcher's and i don't see a clear upgrade. Maybe Brian McCann? I don't know if he is really available though. I'm personally ok with finishing the season with Salty, or Lavarnway. I'd prefer it be Lavarnway though. I think their defense is pretty much the same. I think Lavarnway is a better hitter though. Even with the success it's supposed to be a bridge year... Why not let the young guy get more MLB at bats.

    As far as trading Salty i'm not sure we can get to much for him. Maybe at best we could get a high ceiling prospect who needs a change of scenery?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Nobody is dealing us a killer catcher at anything near a sane price. We could get a journeyman w/o much cost or trouble, but it won't help us unless we have an injury.

    We've got 3 kids that might make it over the next few years including Lavarnway. We'll be looking there. If that fails to give us the right guy, than there is always FA to shoot for before 2014 and beyond.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •