
Originally Posted by
tapajafri
The 49ers dominated the patriots in ever aspect. Offense, defense, and special teams. The only reason the game was close was because the 49ers started playing that soft prevent zone defense crap after being up 31-3. You can't do that to Brady and an offense like New Englands. SF should've just kept the pressure on and it would've been a blow out. SF was clearly the better team and they proved it. They also proved that you can't play soft prevent against Brady because he'll put up points (also known as the 49ers laying back and barely even trying anymore). In reality, the game wasn't that close. The scoreboard doesn't always tell the whole story. Much credit to Pats for coming back, but the 49ers never should have started playing soft zone crap. Their defense was basically a "go ahead and score, but run out the clock" defense. The 49ers dominated the patriots on offense, defense, and special teams.
And just because the 49ers lost to the rams doesn't mean anything. This is the NFL and anything can happen. Teams rarely go 16-0 or even 15-1. The patriots lost to the cardinals in New England, but that doesn't mean the patriots aren't one of the top 3 teams in the league. That doesn't mean Arizona is better than New England. The Steelers lost to the Titants this year. Etc etc. Anything can happen. But in a matchup with two elite teams (like the 49ers vs Patriots), one team clearly dominated the other. 49ers proved they are better than the Patriots and probably the toughest team in the league in the playoffs. Losing to the rams doesn't mean anything in the long run in terms of the super bowl/playoffs. Like I said, the patriots lost to the cardinals in New England, but that doesn't mean **** because the patriots are still heavy contenders out of the AFC.