That's fair. Not completely consistent with past post, but I get the general theme and actually agree. Biggest difference is how great is used. It's more emotional and relative for me. Like if some has a great game IMO it's a game which is a marked improvement over prior games. Sometimes that's just meeting expectations. Other times, he's by far exceeded them. For the most part I agree with everything you said. That's how I evaluate players. However I'm certain the details are very different.
Originally Posted by RickyPrior
Pay attention. You might learn something.