Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,111
    vCash
    1500

    Which team will be worse: Raiders 2013 team or Raiders 2006 team?

    Vote

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    6,695
    vCash
    1500
    It all depends on who is at quarterback. A young super star qb ,or one of the guys we have now .It also depends on Allen's leadership skills that are still very much in question. Until i see what happens on draft day i would have to vote for 2013 will be worse then 2005 ,and 2012. But if R.M. brings in Geno 2013 will be a great year bet on that.


    Feel the wrath of the darkside.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fremont, Ca
    Posts
    8,646
    vCash
    500
    2006.


    Yall let me slip?!?!

  4. 03-31-2013, 05:09 PM
    Reason
    Dupe

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    185
    vCash
    1500
    Pointless thread how can you can make a thread a out a team who hasn't played a snap of football....you don't win games on paper...this team will be better than.most of you are giving them.credit all this 2 or 4 games is nonsense is ridiculous...no faith in yo team

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Golden State
    Posts
    111
    vCash
    1500
    If we get Flynn, we will have a better record than last year.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    1,883
    vCash
    1500
    Hard to tell with only half of a defense and no clue who the QB is. Not eve sure the Raiders have a clue how good/bad they will be because they can't decide who they want to pay.
    "JUST WIN BABY"
    COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,826
    vCash
    1500
    Which thread is worse this one or your last thread, this one hands down.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,459
    vCash
    1500
    It's March and were wondering who's worse. The 2006 raiders or a team who hasn't even taken the field yet. Hasn't even had a draft yet?

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    6,695
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldfaithful2024 View Post
    Too soon to say, but if I had to guess based on the current talent on this roster I'd say 2013 will be as bad as it gets.
    We will have to see what true direction we're headed in if we get rid of Palmer then we're planning for the future ,and drafting Geno will be a great start . If we keep Palmer then we have a shot at a decent season because no name players can win with good leadership . But if we let Palmer go don't draft a guy that can come in here ,and start now make Flynn our starting qb then this season is doomed we'll have to wait til 2014 ,and with the first pick of the 2014 draft which we will surely have take johnny football ,and hope he will be a great qb ,but more then that a great leader.


    Feel the wrath of the darkside.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Posts
    560
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by the_firm_09 View Post
    Which thread is worse this one or your last thread, this one hands down.
    I don't know. Once you get to a certain level of bad, it's not possible to get worse. Several of these threads fall into that category.

    That being said 2006 will forever be the worst Raiders team. It lead to Russell.
    "Life is great. Football is better". -Steve Sabol

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Inland Empire
    Posts
    17,163
    vCash
    1500
    Let me get this straight..

    We don't even have a full roster yet.. Free Agency is not over. The Draft hasn't even happened. We have no clue who the QB will be next year..and you want us to choose who will be worse between a past Raider team and next season's unknown team? Ha..

    There's no way the unknown team will be worse. Bank on it.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    43
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by BigGuy951:25776448
    Let me get this straight..

    We don't even have a full roster yet.. Free Agency is not over. The Draft hasn't even happened. We have no clue who the QB will be next year..and you want us to choose who will be worse between a past Raider team and next season's unknown team? Ha..

    There's no way the unknown team will be worse. Bank on it.
    Completly agree. If I had ti guess. 6 wins next year. Still bad though. Lol.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    154
    vCash
    1500
    Stupidest thread ever , dont plan or think we'll be as bad 06 EVER! Allen is coaching for a job in Oakland and I'm 100% sure he's gonna amaze you non believers, Trust Me!

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,069
    vCash
    1500
    we should get 4 wins next year - im hoping for 7 but that may be my inner homer comming out

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,319
    vCash
    1500
    We don't have Al Davis and now have a true identity and future put into place. Regardless, this team is light years ahead of the 2006 roster, and this thread is just another long line of puzzling threads.....who cares.

  17. 03-31-2013, 08:56 PM
    Reason
    Dupe

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •