Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    If I told you I'd have to kill you.
    Posts
    418
    vCash
    1500

    If the Mets wanted to "buy" a World Series

    OK, if we were living in Fantasyland and the Mets had no financial issues and the owners inherited the spirit of George Steinbrenner...who do you think the Mets would need to sign to buy a 2013 World Series?

    Sign Josh Hamilton and Micheal Bourn, keep R.A.Dickey and...what else?

    I know this is another ridiculous fantasy thread but I'm seriously interested in seeing who you think the Mets would need to if they went Steinbrenner bezerk this offseason.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6,794
    vCash
    1500
    Hamilton, Bourne, Brian Wilson, and every other reliever on the market would give us a shot
    “It's still a game and you'd rather win it than lose it.”



    There is An Angel in CitiField- LETS GO METS!


    Proud to be PSD's "The Kid"


    New York Giants-2012 World Champions

    SuperMann #10, Superman wears Eli Pajamas

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    6,947
    vCash
    1500
    Hamilton, Bourne, Wilson, and all the relievers we can get. So basically same as lvlheaded

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,051
    vCash
    1500
    Why in the world would you all want Micheal Bourn????? He stinks, and is overrated. Even if the Wilpons allowed for a legit spending spree to win titles, Micheal Bourn should never be near our list.

    I say sign Hamilton, Brian Wilson, any other relievers I can't think of right now, AND TRADE for Joe Mauer and King Felix WITHOUT trading away Dickey.

    Do that and you have at least 2 of the next 3 world series titles.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,064
    vCash
    1500
    Sign Hamilton, Greinke, Bourn, any decent relievers. Trade Wheeler, Familia, and even Harvey if you have to for Felix.

    What's sad is that even if we succeed in making these moves, we're still weak at catcher, 2B, SS, and one of the corner OF spots. This team isn't even close to competing and that sucks. LOL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,064
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by bootleg42 View Post
    Why in the world would you all want Micheal Bourn????? He stinks, and is overrated. Even if the Wilpons allowed for a legit spending spree to win titles, Micheal Bourn should never be near our list.

    I say sign Hamilton, Brian Wilson, any other relievers I can't think of right now, AND TRADE for Joe Mauer and King Felix WITHOUT trading away Dickey.

    Do that and you have at least 2 of the next 3 world series titles.
    LOL at you saying we'd "have" AT LEAST 2 of the next 3 WS titles. That's a joke to say cuz it's obviously not true. There's been better Yankee teams that haven't won and TEX has had recent teams better than that too and haven't won.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East of the Sun, West of the Moon
    Posts
    18,047
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by MetsOptimist View Post
    OK, if we were living in Fantasyland and the Mets had no financial issues and the owners inherited the spirit of George Steinbrenner...who do you think the Mets would need to sign to buy a 2013 World Series?

    Sign Josh Hamilton and Micheal Bourn, keep R.A.Dickey and...what else?

    I know this is another ridiculous fantasy thread but I'm seriously interested in seeing who you think the Mets would need to if they went Steinbrenner bezerk this offseason.
    That would be a bad idea. Though Steinbrenner won initially, his stewardship was marked by controversy and embarassment to the degree that Yankee fans chanted "George must go! George must go!" It wasn't until George was banned from baseball that the Yankees gained respect and consistency. The spirit of George Steinbrenner is not what you want. What you want is his money, and qualified and competent people to decide how to spend it.
    “The Wilpons and Mr. Saul Katz — the people who say they don’t care about the team are sorely misguided,” Ojeda told the newspaper. “These are the biggest Mets fans you will meet."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,051
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by bklynny67 View Post
    LOL at you saying we'd "have" AT LEAST 2 of the next 3 WS titles. That's a joke to say cuz it's obviously not true. There's been better Yankee teams that haven't won and TEX has had recent teams better than that too and haven't won.
    Joe Mauer and Josh Hamilton in our lineup would give David Wright a ton of fastballs. Remember the last time David Wright was in a lineup with two stars (Carlos Delgado and Carlos Beltran)???????? Wright had career numbers. Once those two left, Wright fell off one level. Putting Wright back in a lineup with two high avg. hitting stars would get Wright back to megastar level. That would be a tough lineup to contend with. I didn't even mention the fastballs Ike Davis would see.

    Dickey and King Felix would make us tough to be in any playoff series.

    If my suggestions were taken seriously, it would be hard to see how we don't at least make it to 2 of the next 3 world series.

    Of course.........theses are the Mets, lol........

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East of the Sun, West of the Moon
    Posts
    18,047
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by bootleg42 View Post
    Why in the world would you all want Micheal Bourn????? He stinks, and is overrated.
    You can count on Bourn for 3 to 5 WAR. That doesn't stink. It's well above replacement. Replacement stinks. Any argument that begins with "Michael Bourn stinks" is automatically discredited.
    “The Wilpons and Mr. Saul Katz — the people who say they don’t care about the team are sorely misguided,” Ojeda told the newspaper. “These are the biggest Mets fans you will meet."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    7,480
    vCash
    1500

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by bootleg42 View Post
    Why in the world would you all want Micheal Bourn????? .


    Bourn would become the best everyday player on our team not named David Wright if we were to sign him. Buy a clue.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    7,480
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Dugmet View Post
    You can count on Bourn for 3 to 5 WAR. That doesn't stink. It's well above replacement. Replacement stinks. Any argument that begins with "Michael Bourn stinks" is automatically discredited.
    Agreed. Stunning ignorance.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    22,274
    vCash
    1500
    The problem with Michael Bourn would be if he wanted 5+ years, not his ability.

    Speed doesn't age well and he will be 30 this month, you saw a decline in his SB numbers last year (61 in 2011 to 42 this year) and he lead the league in CS.

    It's very similar to Reyes in that respect (except Bourn being older), when the legs begin to go his value starts to plummet. Reyes benefits however from a position that his offense can still be above average even if the SB numbers drop. Bourn doesn't have that same luxury.

    The 155 k's from the leadoff spot also concern you to some extent.

    He is a good signing for 2 or 3 years but that's about it, not the 5+ years he is looking for.
    Last edited by metswon69; 12-06-2012 at 06:54 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    507
    vCash
    1500
    Pujols or Miguel Cabrera would be on this team. Especially if Omar was still around he adored miguel

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,051
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Dugmet View Post
    You can count on Bourn for 3 to 5 WAR. That doesn't stink. It's well above replacement. Replacement stinks. Any argument that begins with "Michael Bourn stinks" is automatically discredited.
    Jayson Werth had a 4.2 and a 4.3 WAR the two years before he was signed to be a Washington National.

    Carl Crawford had a 6.6 WAR the year before he was signed to be a Boston Red Sox, and was a ~4 WAR player in the years before that.

    How did those contracts and signings turn out?????

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    22,274
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by bootleg42 View Post
    Jayson Werth had a 4.2 and a 4.3 WAR the two years before he was signed to be a Washington National.

    Carl Crawford had a 6.6 WAR the year before he was signed to be a Boston Red Sox, and was a ~4 WAR player in the years before that.

    How did those contracts and signings turn out?????
    It's not fair to compare Carl Crawford or Jayson Werth to Michael Bourn.

    Werth was a product of Citizen's Bank park and once he moved to a more difficult park to hit home runs in (81 games a year) he got exposed. The pressure from such a large deal also got to him to some extent.

    As for Crawford, a lot of people around him said coming to a big market where there was a ton of pressure would be a bad idea. Even some of his teammates from Tampa felt that way. In all fairness to him though, he had one bad season and wasn't able to recover from it due to being injured and then traded last year. Saying that, that contract was also unbelievably ridiculous from the start.

    Bourn won't get that type of money/ that amount of years, neither is there any indication he can't handle pressure or playing in a bigger market. His skill set is also different than Werth's. I don't see him being a bad investment for 2 or 3 years but again not for 5+ years.

    Any team that gives him that long will regret it by 2016.
    Last edited by metswon69; 12-06-2012 at 07:04 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •