Last edited by metswon69; 12-10-2012 at 06:28 PM.
Sponsored Links |
|
Besides the fact that your post should be removed for insulting a member of PSD - I am right. The offense - including its nomenclature, the patterns being run, and the percentage of personnel groups being used between 2007 and 2012 are not the same. There are some commonalities obviously, but that doesn't mean it's the same. I am surprised that someone who opines so much about Brady and the Patriots should be so fundamentally ill-informed. BB is all about learning and adapting and going counter to prior patterns.
9-10 is Mannings career playoff record.9-10? you mean 6-10? smh... he did have a bad yr throwing 26INT but also threw for over 4,000 yds with 62.7 completion %, which was actually a better completion % than 2 of 3 of Brady's Superbowl winning seasons so go figure....Oh yeah and Edgerrin James ACL tear didnt help any either
Manning has gotten more out of his running game since 2001 than Brady got out of his, surrounded by a more expensive and better set of offensive players then Brady had as I posted earlier in this thread.well when you only throw for less than 4,000 yds for only three times in 15 yrs It shows you they are doing hell of alot more throwing than running which would imply that outside of Edgerrin James and 2 decent seasons out of Joseph Addai that he really didn't have a running game
Stop letting your frustration cause you to insult other posters.please dont be bias because your a Patriots fan
I am not a con artist! I am a businessman! I have a big brain and I'm good at making deals! People are just jealous of my BIG BRAIN! BAD!
Guess who? The future X-Presdent...
Is Manning really under .500 in the postseason? Wow, I was always under the impression he had a better winning %
Shawn: Do you think they'll notice??Dirk: Nah we should be ok, just act normalDALLAS MAVERICKSCuban Era11 50+ season12 straight playoff appearances2 Division titles(2007, 2010)2 Conference titles(2006, 2011)2010-2011 NBA Champions
Sponsored Links |
|
The point was in reference to Josh McDaniels, Charlie Weiss, and the Mangenius having specific offensive philosophies that could make any QB good.
Obviously most of those QBs he has listed aren't and haven't become that or for that matter haven't had the prolonged level of success Brady has.
Making one pro bowl isn't the mark of a good QB either considering how many guys drop out of the game and who they are replaced with.
Tom Brady is not a product of a system, just let it go..
Last edited by metswon69; 12-10-2012 at 10:56 PM.
Because he's one of the elite players at the most important position consistently and over such a long span.
Brees and Rodgers have not done it for as long.
Brady gets just as much credit or more, but remember him tearing his ACL and Matt Cassell leading Belichek's team to 11 wins without Brady? Therefore, Belichek gets some of NE's credit. When Manning missed an entire season his team didn't win a game until week 13 or 14 and only won two all year. That shows his immense importance. He has won with different head coaches too, so you can't just say his coach was a main factor.
I'm not saying Manning is better than Brady, but it is debatable. And those are my reasons for Manning getting hype. I'm not going to compare it to Tebow, because Manning plays and produces.
I wonder when people will finally get sick of this one....
Brady in 2007: 18-1 .948 - SB Team
Cassel in 2008: 11-5 .688 - Missed playoffs
Cassel was 8th in the NFL in QB Rating in 2010 on KC, so he wasn't exactly an idiot like the Colts offering last year. That's a .260 difference in winning percentage in favor of Brady.
Really?Therefore, Belichek gets some of NE's credit. When Manning missed an entire season his team didn't win a game until week 13 or 14 and only won two all year. That shows his immense importance. He has won with different head coaches too, so you can't just say his coach was a main factor.
2010: 10-7 .588 (typical Manning 1st round loss)
2011: 2-12 .125 (suck for Luck - 72.2 QB Rating by the 3 stooges at QB)
2012: 9-4 .692 (Luck)
So, are you going to have to change your story? Luck a rookie to date this year has a substantially better record than Manning in 2010, and a .104 better winning percentage. So Luck > Manning? If you think whatever Cassel did that year somehow overshadowed Brady, then you must agree Luck > Manning.
So your point is? Blown up.............
I am not a con artist! I am a businessman! I have a big brain and I'm good at making deals! People are just jealous of my BIG BRAIN! BAD!
Guess who? The future X-Presdent...
Yeah real system QB Brady is with 3 TD passes in the first half against a top 5 defense in the league.
Owner
LOL. Bags hates PM so much.
Sponsored Links |
|