Things NFL Fans Should Never Bring Up Again

[j11430]

I'm getting tired of people putting +1 after posts they agree with

+1



There, now no one can make the lame joke

[Jack of Blades]

+1



there, now no one can make the lame joke

+1

[kmo429]

So the Green Bay Packers aren't a better, more successful franchise then say the Detroit Lions or Philadelphia Eagles even though GB has 4 SBs and the others have none?

Then that's my pick. The opposite. I hate it when a fan of a franchise that's never won a championship gets mad when I say my team is a more successful franchise because it has 5 championships and yours has zero.

No one says "We are a more successful franchise..."

Dumbasses, when trying to make an ignorant argument that a certain team sucks or is worse than their own, say "Weve won 10 (any number) Superbowls, how many rings do you have?"

No one uses it to form an argument that their team is "historically more successful" they use it because they have no other ****ing argument and are ignorant and immature and have no other knowledge to make a legitimate argument. It's used as a last resort insult for the uneducated fan.

[kmo429]

John Gruden saying "he's a real ballplayer" and "I'd like to have him on my team"

[NormSizedMidget]

No one says "We are a more successful franchise..."

Dumbasses, when trying to make an ignorant argument that a certain team sucks or is worse than their own, say "Weve won 10 (any number) Superbowls, how many rings do you have?"

No one uses it to form an argument that their team is "historically more successful" they use it because they have no other ****ing argument and are ignorant and immature and have no other knowledge to make a legitimate argument. It's used as a last resort insult for the uneducated fan.

Ahh this is a very good one too.

How about "hater"

Has anyone said that yet.

[JeffG20]

Ahh this is a very good one too.

How about "hater"

Has anyone said that yet.

the term hater is why i cant go into the nba forum anymore and i will disown anyone in my life that uses it

[NormSizedMidget]

the term hater is why i cant go into the nba forum anymore and i will disown anyone in my life that uses it

It's a cop out for criticism on your team. It's all it is.

[RaiderLakersA's]

I'd rather watch the game on TV then go to the game.

Well, until they allow you to throw your remote at the player that just gave up the 50 yard rush for a TD because he couldn't tackle worth a damn, I'm going to keep saying it.

[RaiderLakersA's]

Ah, yes... "deceptive" speed. Hate that too.

Add "lateral quickness" to that.

[RaiderLakersA's]

White slot receivers being Wes Welker clones.

I often wondered why no one was ever dubbed "The next Steve Largent."

[RaiderLakersA's]

Tom bradys wet suit or whatever it is. Seriously weve heard about it every cold game for like 3 years now, the commentators dont need to tell us every damn game

His what??? Nevermind, I don't want to know.

[Austeezy]

It's a cop out for criticism on your team. It's all it is.

But there are legit haters in both forums. If you can't call them haters, what do you call them???

[OREcoast49er]

No one says "We are a more successful franchise..."

Dumbasses, when trying to make an ignorant argument that a certain team sucks or is worse than their own, say "Weve won 10 (any number) Superbowls, how many rings do you have?"

No one uses it to form an argument that their team is "historically more successful" they use it because they have no other ****ing argument and are ignorant and immature and have no other knowledge to make a legitimate argument. It's used as a last resort insult for the uneducated fan.

You've really never had that debate before? I have. Thought it was common place.

And really, when your team sucks, what else do you have but past glory or hope fore the future?

[NormSizedMidget]

But there are legit haters in both forums. If you can't call them haters, what do you call them???

If they're truly haters then the arguments they have are flawed and can be dissected easily. You do that, you win. You call them haters, you just can't argue against their points and that's all you have left.

[Austeezy]

If they're truly haters then the arguments they have are flawed and can be dissected easily. You do that, you win. You call them haters, you just can't argue against their points and that's all you have left.

Right, you can call them haters and dissect their flawed argument