1st part is true! Second is the most wrong thing I have seen since the movie Jesus Christ Serial Rapist.
Gabbert has a better passer rating and completion rate than eight or nine starting quarterbacks in the league to this point in the season. He is younger than all of them, and still younger than most of the guys coming out of college this year. Why would you think it makes sense for the Jags to draft a quarterback? Won't happen.
Well, like I said, over a quarter of the league's starters at the moment have worse stats. With generally more to work with in terms of offensive talent around them. Everyone talking about Luck as the second coming, but I think Gabbert has a better passer rating and completion percentage. He is also a bit younger. Why is one guy with the same stats a future star and the other guy a writeoff? Other than blind stupid bias. But that is your problem not Gabbert's.
WHAT THE HELL is with all the delusional Jags fans? Gabbert... sucks.
Who is Gabbert younger than?
Blaine is 23.
Barkley, Geno, Glennon, Dysert, Nassib, Manuel are all 22.
Wilson is 23 and a month older...
GABBERT IS CRAP whether he's 20 or 28, he still sucks.
Blaine just turned 23 and those guys are all 23 before the draft, Klein as well, except Smith and Barkley. None of them has close to the tools that Gabbert has. Including Smith and Barkley. So you use a top five pick on a guy who is the same age, less talented, and has no pro experience? Won't happen.