Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 168
  1. 12-04-2012, 04:50 PM #46
    T $$$'s Avatar
    T $$$
    T $$$ is offline Twisted Fister
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    K-zoo
    Posts
    816
    Yeah, I don't think that you give a "significant offer" to a guy that only played in 87 games and batted .228 but with that said, Wow, what wheels...and only $485,000...and only 24 years old...I could see him batting 9th for us...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-04-2012, 04:50 PM #47
    Dekker's Avatar
    Dekker
    Dekker is offline Mr. Ilitch
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    2,346
    well I guess I used a bad example because Arizona is talking with Philly about Lee for Upton
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-04-2012, 04:56 PM #48
    T $$$'s Avatar
    T $$$
    T $$$ is offline Twisted Fister
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    K-zoo
    Posts
    816
    That makes sense for both teams, especially the D Backs...so sick of the phantom Upton trade talk though, trade the dude and lets move on already...sheesh!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-04-2012, 04:58 PM #49
    Dekker's Avatar
    Dekker
    Dekker is offline Mr. Ilitch
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    2,346
    haha I think I beat you to the punch there a few weeks ago when I got really drunk and told someone to stop sucking Upton's dick
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-04-2012, 07:07 PM #50
    kokes's Avatar
    kokes
    kokes is offline All-American
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    274
    Lee for Upton wasn't true at all. Both GMs said it was false. Someone jumping the gun trying to make a story.

    I think Gordon could be have without adding Castellanos. They only say they want a significant return so they might actually get offered something decent. He was a top prospect and he is only 24 so I could see them wanting a bit. Yet, they're looking for a SS or 3B to pair with Hanley, sounds to me like they've given up on Gordon.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 12-04-2012, 07:09 PM #51
    kokes's Avatar
    kokes
    kokes is offline All-American
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    274
    Quote Originally Posted by Dekker View Post
    haha I think I beat you to the punch there a few weeks ago when I got really drunk and told someone to stop sucking Upton's dick
    Ya you did lol It was badly needed though, I'm tired of the Upton talks. Trade him, don't trade him, couldn't care less anymore.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 12-04-2012, 07:15 PM #52
    T $$$'s Avatar
    T $$$
    T $$$ is offline Twisted Fister
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    K-zoo
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by kokes View Post
    Ya you did lol It was badly needed though, I'm tired of the Upton talks. Trade him, don't trade him, couldn't care less anymore.
    No doubt...**** Upton.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 12-04-2012, 07:17 PM #53
    T $$$'s Avatar
    T $$$
    T $$$ is offline Twisted Fister
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    K-zoo
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by kokes View Post
    Lee for Upton wasn't true at all. Both GMs said it was false. Someone jumping the gun trying to make a story.

    I think Gordon could be have without adding Castellanos. They only say they want a significant return so they might actually get offered something decent. He was a top prospect and he is only 24 so I could see them wanting a bit. Yet, they're looking for a SS or 3B to pair with Hanley, sounds to me like they've given up on Gordon.
    Start the conversation with Peralta and see what else it takes...I mean so many other Tigers fans think that he is a SS...I for one don't but he could play 3B and move Ramirez to SS. I am guessing that they would want a pitcher in the deal as well and Oliver is available, not that that garners us much either....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 12-04-2012, 08:06 PM #54
    drewstantontime
    drewstantontime is offline General Manager
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,321
    what about Troy Tulowitski? Injuries are obviously a huge concern, but when healthy, hes legitimate superstar. Colorado is in a rebuilding mode like crazy. Id take a shot and see if hes available. He would cost alot but a player with his talent would be worth it to me.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 12-04-2012, 08:17 PM #55
    scottie
    scottie is offline The HYPE
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,869
    Quote Originally Posted by drewstantontime View Post
    what about Troy Tulowitski? Injuries are obviously a huge concern, but when healthy, hes legitimate superstar. Colorado is in a rebuilding mode like crazy. Id take a shot and see if hes available. He would cost alot but a player with his talent would be worth it to me.
    I'd crap my pants!
    "If a, would a, could a, should a, Lived on Maybe street, the street that never was"....Rad Alger
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 12-04-2012, 09:27 PM #56
    JackB
    JackB is offline Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,932
    Red Sox are laying the foundation to trade Ellsbury. That would work for me.
    "Just because the path is well beaten. That doesn't mean it's the right way to go"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 12-04-2012, 10:58 PM #57
    T $$$'s Avatar
    T $$$
    T $$$ is offline Twisted Fister
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    K-zoo
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by scottie View Post
    I'd crap my pants!
    Make that two of us that would deuce ourselves...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 12-04-2012, 10:59 PM #58
    T $$$'s Avatar
    T $$$
    T $$$ is offline Twisted Fister
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    K-zoo
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by JackB View Post
    Red Sox are laying the foundation to trade Ellsbury. That would work for me.
    Not even going to respond to this one...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 12-04-2012, 11:27 PM #59
    GuySir's Avatar
    GuySir
    GuySir is offline Go Blue
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saginaw, MI
    Posts
    8,382
    Quote Originally Posted by JackB View Post
    Red Sox are laying the foundation to trade Ellsbury. That would work for me.
    Just don't go into the Red Sox forum, that never goes well for you
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 12-05-2012, 01:39 AM #60
    Amaradio15
    Amaradio15 is offline Late Round Draft Pick
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    324
    No Dexter Fowler; giving Porcello is too much. Stephen Drew would be a major downgrade from Peralta and that says a lot considering Peralta isn't anything special. I can see us throwing $12M/year for 5 years at Anibal Sanchez. He would be stupid not to take that because we are overpaying. He is worth no more than $10M/season but with a weak pitching market, he'll get more money. I say we trade the farm for King Felix. I'm tired of hearing he is untouchable; I strongly believe that everything has a price.

    Porcello, Smyly, Castellanos, Boesch, and Oliver would be a starting point and possibly enough to get it done. We are giving Seattle #3/#4 starters in Porcello and Smyly. Castellanos has all the potential in the world. And Boesch and Oliver are projects that could pan out, could not. I hate giving up Castellanos because of his immense potential to be a stud but having a rotation of Verlander, King Felix, Scherzer, Fister, and whoever we sign or bring up would be huge. Wishful thinking? Perhaps..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules