| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Well, is it safe to say this will be Ben's first blunder?
if we trade Ellsbury, Victorino wouldnt be a terrible signing. We have Bradley waiting in the wings, and Victorino won't be an important piece whatsoever. If he plays well, hell be able to split with someone like Kalish. Maybe Kalish hits righties and Victorino hits lefties
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Ughhh.
This is ironic
@GordonEdes
Red Sox liked Haren, but it was simply a matter of money. Weren't going to $13m after a season in which his velocity dipped
Fenway has a big RF area and I think that Victorino and Ells would be fine as a RF/CF combo until JBJ arrives and takes Ells spot next year, or after the trade deadline. We can have Ells in CF and Victorino in RF.
"You’re either two feet in now or you’re two feet out. Let us know now because we’re coming."
-Pedey
Follow me on Twitter: S_____C_____
^ This.
Now I know there's no such thing as a "sure thing" pitching prospect, but I'd rather get a handful of #2/#3 guys for Ells and 3 of them pan out, pay a guy like Halladay two years from now, and have a rotation with one veteran (#1) and fill the rest with farm arms. That being said, I'd package Clay or Lester with Ells and 3 or 4 prospects for 2 solid farm arms.
Also, Victorino is another "character" guy who I think would be great in the clubhouse. Having a RHH who can hit 15-20 HR and swipe 20+ bases easily and is a plus defender sounds good to me.
I'm in the same boat as others. Trade Ellabury and the Victorino signing is easier to swallow. We have guys like Bradley and Brentz coming along nicely in the system so there needs to be an open spot Soon so letting Ells go would be wise.
If we can land a SP or SS for Ells, our offseason is a success.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|