Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 46
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    37,062
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by SDBearsFan View Post



    I don't give a **** what system we run, so long as Brandon Marshall is targeted 20 times a game.
    I honestly wouldn't have a problem with throwing the ball only to Brandon and Matt. Seriously.


  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,948
    vCash
    1500

    Hamstring strain could sideline Urlacher for season

    We are ****ing fine. Time for our entire fan base to get behind our team like never before and show our new starters they got this.

    After all emery is god

    And cutler's initials are JC for a reason.

    Coming up alshon and bmarsh, with bush slamming. What up!



    our future

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    37,062
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by mikebrez bears/ View Post
    We are ****ing fine. Time for our entire fan base to get behind our team like Sandusky at a daycare and show our new starters they got this.

    After all emery is god

    And JCamp's initials are JC for a reason.

    Coming up alshon and bmarsh, with bush slamming. What up!
    Edited


  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,015
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by debo View Post
    I honestly wouldn't have a problem with throwing the ball only to Brandon and Matt. Seriously.
    Right there with you, man. I watch the games at this bar near my house and these two idiot Bears fans I watch the game with are always *****ing about how we throw to Marshall too much. Makes me want to pimp slap the **** out of them.

    I had high hopes for Bennett and Hester coming into the season, but they're unfortunately not real receivers. Bennett really, really disappointed me the most because of his chemistry with Jay. And Kellen Davis? **** Kellen Davis.

    Throw the ball to Brandon, run the ball. Honestly, I'd like to see Forte lineup more as a receiver and have Bush in the backfield.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #20
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    19,879
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by debo View Post
    Edited

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    37,062
    vCash
    500
    Yeah, I'm surprised Bennett hasn't been as big of a factor in our passing game. I think he'll still be an important player moving forward, but we need a speed compliment out there. 4 wides with BMarsh, Alshon, Earl, and a guy like Knox would be diiiiiiirty.


  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,015
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by debo View Post
    Yeah, I'm surprised Bennett hasn't been as big of a factor in our passing game. I think he'll still be an important player moving forward, but we need a speed compliment out there. 4 wides with BMarsh, Alshon, Earl, and a guy like Knox would be diiiiiiirty.

    I don't think Knox plays football ever again, unfortunately. Plus, he's a free agent after the season.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    70,015
    vCash
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SDBearsFan View Post
    I don't think Knox plays football ever again, unfortunately. Plus, he's a free agent after the season.
    Nah under the CBA he can be kept on the team under his rookie contract

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    37,062
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by SDBearsFan View Post
    I don't think Knox plays football ever again, unfortunately. Plus, he's a free agent after the season.
    I'm not saying Knox necessarily...just someone like him.

    I agree that he's probably done.


  10. #25
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,948
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by debo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SDBearsFan View Post
    I don't think Knox plays football ever again, unfortunately. Plus, he's a free agent after the season.
    I'm not saying Knox necessarily...just someone like him.

    I agree that he's probably done.
    Derek kinder?



    our future

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    37,062
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by mikebrez bears/ View Post
    Derek kinder?
    I'll take anyone that's impactful and can stretch the field. Maybe Berrian's still got it????


  12. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    You can always create a place for yourself.
    Posts
    4,580
    vCash
    1500
    He will be a huge loss. It seems things are falling apart all of a sudden. He needs to be back next year even if we win the superbowl. We don't have a solid replacement for him and his position. Nick Roach isn't good enough. We all saw his play few years ago when urlacher was out the whole season
    Cubs Bulls Bears Blackhawks



  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    37,062
    vCash
    500
    Roach played fine. Our problem wasn't Nick Roach.


    He's not Urlacher, but he wasn't a liability.


  14. #29
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,948
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by debo View Post
    Roach played fine. Our problem wasn't Nick Roach.


    He's not Urlacher, but he wasn't a liability.
    This is an accurate statement



    our future

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    You can always create a place for yourself.
    Posts
    4,580
    vCash
    1500
    urlacher is not a liability. he can make plays that roach can never do. beside roach isn't as smart as urlacher. also, don't forget briggs. Briggs play much better with urlacher on the side
    Cubs Bulls Bears Blackhawks



Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •