Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Which team would you rather have for 1 season.

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Bad team, very entertaining and likable

    5 17.24%
  • Good team, very boring and unlikable

    24 82.76%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Castlevania
    Posts
    3,874

    For 1 season.....

    Every player on the team is going to become a free agent so all these players will have no bearing on the year after.

    Would you rather your team be a bad team but very entertaining to watch and the players are very likable.

    Or

    Would you raher your team be good but the team is very boring to watch and everyone on the team is very unlikable.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    6,752
    umm. good.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    30,180
    Good. No matter how unlikable the players or boring they play, winning is entertaining.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    836
    Depends. If by good we are talking wild card contender/slightly above 500 I'll take the fun team. Than again if the good team is actually ws contending good(I know in the playoffs everyone has a shot) than I will take them.

    I guess it just depends on your definition of good IMO.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,064
    Unless the player is a complete idiot, like Luke Scott, then I don't care about the personalities of the players too much.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,352
    Likeability is chemistry. Both seem more prevelant when your winning.

  7. #7
    Ian. Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Vampirate View Post
    Every player on the team is going to become a free agent so all these players will have no bearing on the year after.

    Would you rather your team be a bad team but very entertaining to watch and the players are very likable.

    Or

    Would you raher your team be good but the team is very boring to watch and everyone on the team is very unlikable.
    I see it every year with Seattle.

    I'll take the good team 100/100

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    18,403
    You didn't tell me where my farm system would rank.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    342
    By the end of 162 I'm going to end up liking the unlikeable winners a hell of a lot more than I would the loveable losers.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    The Heart of Long Island
    Posts
    7,313
    Although this question doesn't really make sense, since winning would pretty much mean they're fun to watch, I voted for #1. I'm used to ****** teams, and I'd always prefer a team of hard working players who have fun over a team of robots.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East of the Sun, West of the Moon
    Posts
    22,704
    Entertaining > Boredom.
    Better exiled than succumb to hypocrisy. -- Soe Hok Gie

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,649
    Entertaining.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    35,801
    Winning has the biggest effect on perception of players. The only likable and entertaining bad team is a young team.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Castlevania
    Posts
    3,874
    And I just gotta say, the good team would be extrememly boring to watch, AND EVERY PLAYER WOULD HAVE THE PERSONALITY LIKE JOHN ROCKER.

    That's the kind of dislike I am talking about.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    suffolk county, li ny
    Posts
    4,392
    Idc if we win 1-0 or 99-98 as long as we win , stupid thread

    My first child Emma already knows what time it is!!! 8-9-16

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •