
Originally Posted by
sdsportsfan
Billups had been in the league for 6 seasons when he came to the Pistons, he did learn how to become a better PG. Knight can too, remember that he is only 21 yrs old, has been running the point since day one(for the most part).
Give him another season, then you can start the Knight bashing, ala Stuckey.
All I am saying is that it's like when people compared Bynum or Howard's rookie numbers with what Drummond could end up with, kind of a shot in the dark at this point.
No he did not "learn". He was always a true point guard. He just only got an opportunity to show what he has when he came to the Pistons. What did Tmac do in toronto before he went to Orlando? Nothing, he always had the skills but only had the chance to show it in Orlando. Lemme guess, he just "learned it" in orlando right?
Don't ever say Billups learned it, he always had it. I bet you never watched a game of Billups before he came to Detroit
And all I'm saying is all you guys said the exact same crap when stuckey was at point. All you guys said give him another year or a better coach or better players. He got all that and is still and will always be a crap point guard in this league.
I said from day one he isnt' a point gaurd and I was right. I'm saying Knight isn't one, and I will be right once again. He is scoring point gaurd. thats it!

Originally Posted by
mike 810
Lol its whatever u used to spell LEMME<<< Is that even a word???
It was auto correct
lol mike

Originally Posted by
mike 810
Exactly stop leaving out key facts like he said billups wasn't a good pg until he became a piston under coach Larry brown. Which was his 6th yr in the league some players adapt quicker then others. So are u saying rose westbrook Irving holiday are all true pgs? Because they aren't they are score 1st pgs exactly what knight is & he already can shoot better then all the pgs I named above. So it would be no billups if people wrote him off in his 2nd 3rd 4th or 5th yrs right??? So stop with your way to early write offs when knight just played his 82nd game 2days ago...

Shut up, he was always good and only got a chance w/ det.
When and why would I say westbrook, rose and irving are true pg? There not, there scoring point guards. There particular teams NEED them to score. We have other players that need to score like Monroe Drummond Singler. We need a point guard to set them up and not look to set himself up.
Can you please use proper grammar, just a little man, I can't even understand some of the crap you write

Originally Posted by
mike 810
Yea exactly & people act like he is a seasoned vet or something. Not to mention nobodys questioning Irvings pg play when he is avg less apg & more turnovers then knight, Irving is at a whopping 4.1 turnover pg.
wow Stop looking at stats. Have you actually physically seen irving play compared to Knight? Irving is light years better then Knight in every aspect of the game. Gaurentee you only watch the Pistons and base every other player off them.
And keep in mind teams focus more on irving then they do Knight. Irving gets doulbed tripled team all the time, don't sit their acting like Knight does.