Serious question concerning what people think about Pau Gasol

[dh144498]

was Pau Gasol 1st option, 2nd option, or 1a/1b with Kobe in 2009-2010? (no troll answers)

[tredigs]

Kobe took 21.5 shots a game, Pau took 13 shots a game. What's not adding up?

[JesusWears24]

It was like when Shaq ate first and Kobe(just as important) ate second. In this case Kobe ate first and then Gasol.

[Raps08-09 Champ]

Kobe always a 2nd option when they winning titles.

[Money_23]

I can already tell where this thread is going to end up. haha

[bucketss]

im not even gonna vote what kind of question is this? lol

[b@llhog24]

2nd option. 1A, 1B as far as overall impact goes.

[Minimal]

During the season Gasol had better PER and more Win Shares than Kobe. During playoffs same PER and more winshares than Kobe.

Still I say it was 1a/1b. They were both as important.

[ManRamForPrez24]

Pau was never a first option...assuming this is just pertaining to scoring. A lot of the time he was a 1b to Kobe's 1a, but never the clear first option. In their championship runs, I do think they were essentially of equal value. But Kobe forever is a first option.

[DanG]

1a 1b

[Hellcrooner]

Kobe took much more shot thus pau was a second option.

If you mean value to the team succes, then its a 1a 1b situation.

[Chronz]

Are you asking us to evaluate their impact or their propensity for putting up shots?

[Money_23]

I wonder who voted for 1st option.

[Raps08-09 Champ]

I wonder who voted for 1st option.

I did.

I believe that I didn't have to answer seriously because this is a stupid question.

[mngopher35]

Kobe was clearly the first option on that team. If your asking who had the most value to that team its closer to a 1a 1b situation.