Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Worse contract signing for the Bulls? Ben Wallace or Carlos Boozer

Voters
49. You may not vote on this poll
  • Ben Wallace

    39 79.59%
  • Carlos Boozer

    10 20.41%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 50
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
    Posts
    65,519
    vCash
    1500

    Worse contract signing for the Bulls? Ben Wallace or Carlos Boozer

    Worse contract signing for the Bulls? Ben Wallace or Carlos Boozer


    When we were ready to be contenders the Bulls franchise decided to sign Ben Wallace in the summer of 2006. The same was said in the summer of 2010 as well when we signed Carlos Boozer.
    Neither ended up being what we thought they were going to be, but we did have some success with both. With Ben Wallace we managed to get out of round 1 sweeping the defending champion Miami Heat and with Boozer we got to the ECF. With that said and considering the contracts (Wallace 4 years 60 million and Boozer 5 years 75 million). Which contract would you say was worse?
    "Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
    - Michael Jordan

    Thanks MJ-Bulls for the picture.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,041
    vCash
    1500
    Ben Wallace no debate
    @paulpierce34 I told Wade I will **** his mom like how my man D. West did his mans. Thats why I got ejected
    Ignore List:
    AIMelo=KillaDUO; Reason: Makes up stories to protect the one he beats his meat to everynight(Melo)
    Chucky Woods; Reason: Packer Homer that just talks outta his Azz
    HaruSoul; Reason: Sanchez homer can't see that he is a POS qb
    Hustlenomics; Reason: Good luck debating with this Ronda homer
    nickdymez; Reason: Kobe/Laker homer but didn't even know how the Lakers got Kobe

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Outter Haven.
    Posts
    5,223
    vCash
    1500
    Ben Wallace contract was worse.

    Boozer isn't that bad. Benny Wally was that bad when on the bulls.

    Also, Boozer can be amnestied at any time. Wallace couldn't.

    So ultimately. Boozer has the better contract.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Windy City
    Posts
    56,177
    vCash
    500
    Easily Wallace, not even a debate.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,068
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by KHinrich12 View Post
    Easily Wallace, not even a debate.
    This.

    Boozer's paper is bad in that he got paid free agent money and was never "the answer" in Chicago, but that's it. He's producing, just not what many of Bulls fan base wanted - he's the solid consolation prize from the "summer of Lebron."

    Wallace went from stud to dud quickly (due to injuries) and became a distraction to boot. Never performed to his DPOY standards and the Bulls paid far too much for him.
    Last edited by TopsyTurvy; 11-27-2012 at 11:35 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    79
    vCash
    1500
    I'm no boozer fan but there's no debate, easily ben wallace

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    8,225
    vCash
    1500
    We just got trolled.

    EDIT: Accidentally voted for Boozer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    25,265
    vCash
    54192
    i refuse to vote for this awful question

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    20,466
    vCash
    1500
    This would come out when Boozer has been beasting.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas
    Posts
    54,032
    vCash
    1500
    Wallace, no question.

    He was only productive for 1 season and then a locker room distraction the next and then eventually traded. Boozer's been productive, but never embraced by Bulls fans and the media's been ridiculously hard on him.

    Hell, Boozer isn't even the worse PF contract of that 2010 offseason, Amare is and it's not that close.
    Last edited by DamnGoat; 11-27-2012 at 12:40 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    7,060
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnGoat View Post
    Wallace, no question.

    He was only productive for 1 season and then a locker room distraction the next and then eventually traded. Boozer's been productive, but never embraced by Bulls fans and the media's been ridiculously hard on him.

    Hell, Boozer isn't even the worse PF contract of that 2010 offseason, Amare is and it's not that close.
    This. It's took bad the guy gets so much unwarranted ****. He's never caused any problems nor complained in the locker room nor in the media on top of all that.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    987
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnGoat View Post
    Wallace, no question.

    He was only productive for 1 season and then a locker room distraction the next and then eventually traded. Boozer's been productive, but never embraced by Bulls fans and the media's been ridiculously hard on him.

    Hell, Boozer isn't even the worse PF contract of that 2010 offseason, Amare is and it's not that close.
    It depends what you consider productive, and boozer has not been $75 million dollars productive, thats why everyone has been hard on him. If he was getting around 50 million then his production would match his salary, but at $75 million his productuon just is not worth it..

    And to answer the thread its wallace of course.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    34,005
    vCash
    1500
    Wallace was trash after his first year and was just an albatross of a contract. Boozer at least still has good nights.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,403
    vCash
    1500
    Boozer is actually underrated by the bulls

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,903
    vCash
    1500
    Both don't have any post game what so ever

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •