AdamRubinESPN David Wright really doesn't need no-trade clause. He'll have 10 years of MLB service by mid-2014 and can't be traded without consent after.
AdamRubinESPN David Wright really doesn't need no-trade clause. He'll have 10 years of MLB service by mid-2014 and can't be traded without consent after.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
AdamRubinESPN I'll respectfully say this on negative note: Bar is really low these days for Mets if keeping own stars is now viewed as great achievement.
Ken Rosenthal Told #Mets' offer of extension to Wright yesterday was 6 yrs./$100M. Source today says team offering 7 yrs. between $125M and $150M
AdamRubinESPN I'm led to believe payroll will be slightly higher than the roughly $95M from this year, but not crazy higher.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
If he says no, **** him and deal him. He's not worth anywhere close to $150M.
There is only so much the team can do, if the team offers the appropriate amount of money and he rejects, that's on the player. That would be worse than Reyes leaving because he wasn't offered anything.
Jon Heyman @JonHeymanCBS sources: Mets' offer to David Wright is 7 years about $135-140M
Unless they are offering 6/$119-$124M with the option year included making it that much.
Or maybe they are offering 7/$135-$140M with the option year negated and the money back-loaded. That would offer more flexibility for right now.
If it's not those 2 choices, then 8 year $150M+ is way too much for him. That's on Matt Kemp's level, and Wright is no Kemp.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|