LAL/NYK discussing Gasol for Amare swap

[jchase3]

I'm not sure how credible this is but what do you guys think? The Knicks would definitely have to include Shumpert in my opinion.

http://www.prosportsdaily.com/networ...ticleid=747902

[The1_Who_knocks]

No thanks

[dodgerfan87]

I don't want Amare. I want Josh Smith!

[Avenged24]

I find it hard to believe.. This is as idiotic as it gets.

[TripleOcho3]

If Shumpert is included then I would revisit this...

[Teeboy1487]

Noooooooooooooooo.

[Tymathee]

so, trade Gasol, who has 2 years left for Amare who had 5? no way.

its about even on defense and good to great on offense

btw, what the heck would new york do with gasol? they're doin great without a traditional pf/c

[shep33]

I might just stop following the Lakers if this happens. Amare 5 years ago sure. Amare who doesn't play anymore? No thanks.

Doesn't even make sense. Amare isn't playing, and he's injured. We're trading for a player that's worse, injured, and fits even worse than Pau does in this offense?

[Lakers+Giants]

I'd rather have Gasol over both Smith and Amare but I'd rather trade for Amare than Josh Smith. Especially if they include shumpert.

That being said.

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=9dvtkjw

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=cmsre6g

The hawks don't want to give up smith for gasol? Team him up with Smith then

[shep33]

If Shumpert is included then I would revisit this...

So now we get two injured players. There is really nothing I want from the Knicks.

[shep33]

The source is weak too

[The goods]

A Howard and Amare combo is worse not to mention his contract, hell no!!!!

[shep33]

I'd rather trade Pau for nothing and let Jamison and Hill be our PF's

[LAKERMANIA]

No!

[Kaspa]

Hellllllllllll to the NO!