Yes, I support it
No, I don't support it
Other (no clue what this would be)
Visit my Blog.
"REMEMBER: We should let the people who want war set our foreign policy and those who don't care about the insured decide on health care." - @LOLGOP
I commented "I think it would be better to stop supporting lifestyles of discrimination and hypocrisy, but hey, that's just me."lets stop supporting sinful lifestyles like Homosexuality and Bisexualiy; Lets be nicer to one another and lets not get back at people if they do something that iritates you
Let's remember that homophobia is not a fear of gay people...you don't fear them, you are just hateful.
Member of the Owlluminati!
Or one bad action can trigger an endless stream of hate (ex. a black guy once stole my bike so I hate them all or once a gay guy tried to kiss me so I hate them all). There's a deeper emotional/psychology issue here.
IT IS WRONG.... It says so in my Bibel that the lord Jebus doesn't want the homosexuals to produce chillens....
That pretty much is the only argument against Gay marriage.
"You are not acting like the person Mr. Rogers knew you could be."
That is a much higher level of analysis then we come out of the womb with(unfortunately ).
there is evidence to suggest babies key on identifiers that express similarity to them ( so they dont wander off and join a pack of wolves I guess) and have a rudimentary understanding of helpful/harmful.
I shared this before but I know people in here want the info handed to them so here you go:
We'll see how much they like it when they get sex twice a year(Valentines Day and your birthday), and their spouse eventually turns into their mother.
Obviously I'm not married, just generalizing here lol
I don't even know why its an issue. The anti-gay marriage conservatives need to recognize the history of civil rights and progressive changes and accept the fact that they are going to lose this issue.
In the past, the extreme conservatives (and when I say that, I'm talking ideology, not political party; conservatives of the past DO include Democrats in particular southern ones) have been opposed to: women voting, blacks voting, blacks having any rights for that matter, interracial marriages, workers' rights (humane conditions and hours, weekends, etc.), immigrants, women in the workplace, right to drink alcohol, affirmative action to offset all these inequalities, consumer protection....
and it's the liberal progressives who fight for the human rights causes. And in due time they win, because ultimately its the masses and the rights of the people that matter more than anything.
So why do they even bother to fight gay marriage. It's an issue of what a certain group of people have the right to do (just like blacks voting or using public facilities, just like women voting and working, just like Asians marrying Caucasians...), so they know they'll lose out eventually. Why bother fighting it?
This on the other hand is entirely a secular discussion. The controlling document(s) are secular documents.
Since no one is asking any religion to violate what it's tenants are, and the entire discussion is about legal recognition and authorization of gay marriage, the comment by GGGGG-Men was on point, and no where have you made a valid argument about secular marriage and more importantly, you have made no valid argument why gay people should be second class citizens!
Here is the question of the day, does anyone think that wealthy people should pay a lower percentage of their income to taxes than middle class people? Don't argue tax brackets, just a simple question. Do you think someone earning 46 million dollars should pay a lower percentage of their income than say someone earning sixty thousand?
You're talking to me all wrong... It's the wrong tone. You do it again and I'll stab you in the face with a soldering iron. Hey, tell me, does your mother sew? BOOM. Get her to sew that!