View Poll Results: Which season was better?

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll

  • 2001

    11 84.62%

  • 2004

    2 15.38%
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. 11-24-2012, 04:26 PM #1
    Fly
    Fly is offline ✖
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    St. Simon's Island
    Posts
    6,331

    Barry Bonds: 2001 vs 2004

    Which season of his was better?
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods,
    There is a rapture on the lonely shore,
    There is society, where none intrudes,
    By the deep sea, and music in its roar:
    I love not man the less, but Nature more.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 11-24-2012, 05:50 PM #2
    todu82's Avatar
    todu82
    todu82 is offline Let's Make A Deal
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,850
    His 2001 season.
    Favourite Teams:

    Boston Red Sox: 42-29
    Indianapolis Colts: Decent draft, no new wide receiver though.
    Detroit Pistons: 8th pick in the draft
    Ottawa Senators: Great season guys, let's get them next year

    Beautiful:

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-24-2012, 09:15 PM #3
    JordansBulls's Avatar
    JordansBulls
    JordansBulls is offline Retired NBA Mod
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
    Posts
    64,556
    2001 by the fact he hit 73 HR that season.
    "Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
    - Michael Jordan

    Thanks MJ-Bulls for the picture.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 11-25-2012, 11:48 AM #4
    MetsFanatic19's Avatar
    MetsFanatic19
    MetsFanatic19 is offline PSD's Omar Mantequilla
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    The Heart of Long Island
    Posts
    7,324
    Both were absolutely insane. I mean, a .609 OBP in 2004? But I'd take 2001. Close, though.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 11-25-2012, 01:51 PM #5
    Rad_Racing's Avatar
    Rad_Racing
    Rad_Racing is offline Bench Coach
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    I'm Gonna Walk Hell Track, So Cal
    Posts
    921
    That '01 season is great because of the HRs, one could even argue his '02 season was his best.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 11-25-2012, 04:57 PM #6
    SenorGato's Avatar
    SenorGato
    SenorGato is offline Legend
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    11,346
    '01.

    It's ridiculous how good he was...The man put up a .1000 OPS at 41 and 42. Collusion forced retirement on him - BOOOOOOOOO.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 11-25-2012, 09:36 PM #7
    LASportsFan1996's Avatar
    LASportsFan1996
    LASportsFan1996 is offline Dodgers.Lakers.Raiders.SC
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brea,CA
    Posts
    25,907
    2001, only because of the home runs...

    2004 was crazy too though, .600+ OBP?

    #PuigWatch2013
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 11-25-2012, 10:04 PM #8
    Fly
    Fly is offline ✖
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    St. Simon's Island
    Posts
    6,331
    2001 vs. 2004
    AVG: .328 vs. .362
    OBP: .515 vs. .609
    SLG: .863 vs. .812
    ISO: .536 vs. .450
    BB%: 26.7 vs. 37.6
    K%: 14.0 vs. 6.6
    wOBA: .537 vs. .537
    wRC+: 234 vs. 233


    Very, very close.
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods,
    There is a rapture on the lonely shore,
    There is society, where none intrudes,
    By the deep sea, and music in its roar:
    I love not man the less, but Nature more.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 11-25-2012, 10:40 PM #9
    Demon11's Avatar
    Demon11
    Demon11 is offline Manager
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,146
    probably 2004 tbh


    True MVP 49ers 2012
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 11-27-2012, 02:31 AM #10
    T 980's Avatar
    T 980
    T 980 is offline #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Red Bluff, CA
    Posts
    1,473
    For every stat I like during one year, he seems to counter with another awesome stat for that other year. At least to me, both seemed equally productive for the team in their own ways.

    I'll side with 2001, just because home run records are exciting in general and would keep the ballparks full all around the league (where he would be playing). Not only did he produce for the team, but teams for the national league in general.
    I hit my first walk off hit in softball
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 11-27-2012, 03:52 PM #11
    jbeezy's Avatar
    jbeezy
    jbeezy is offline Champions!!!
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The beez neez
    Posts
    15,567
    I miss Barry :cry:
    49er fan? Sign up here
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 11-28-2012, 02:54 PM #12
    Greedy22's Avatar
    Greedy22
    Greedy22 is offline SF Giants: 2 in 3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Oak Harbor, Wa
    Posts
    6,787
    Oh man this is tough! I'd probably take the 01 season just because of all those HRs
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 12-07-2012, 02:11 PM #13
    xnick5757's Avatar
    xnick5757
    xnick5757 is offline Let's Go Bruins!
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,142
    2001 is awesome, 73 hrs is crazy

    but in 2004 he got on base 61% of the time, which is even more insane

    i pick both
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules