I was having a discussion with my buddy Lucas. He is a Vikings fan and I am a Saints fan.
DO NOT MOVE THIS TO THE COMPARISON FORUM.
Anyways. My friend and I were discussing Adrian Peterson and the Saints backs. I said I would rather have the following:
RB - Pierre Thomas (Age 27)
RB - Mark Ingram (Age 22)
RB - Darren Sproles (Age 29)
RB - Chris Ivory (Age 24)
RB/WR - Travaris Cadet (Age 23)
RB - Adrian Peterson (Age 27)
I basically told him the following:
-For our offense, having different dimensions from our backs is more important.
-Running backs shelf life isn't great. I'd much rather have these 5 backs in New Orleans then just one AP.
He obviously disagreed. Who is correct? Would you rather have JUST AP or all 5 of the Saints backs and then use them accordingly (you can trade them, you can line up Cadet at WR like we do, etc.)