
Originally Posted by
boller4prez
You guys do know that Lawrie was 22 and Gose 21 last year right? Marisnick was 22 and in AA. Hech was 23 and spent most of the year in AAA. Those two were the centerpieces of the Marlins deal.
Not a fan of Niese anyways (even if we needed LH SP- We have three). I don't know how his stuff translates to the AL and the AL East.
As far as Dickey goes, I would mind acquiring him if the price is right. But at the end of the day he's a 38 year old knuckleballer. I wouldn't give up a ton of prospects for him.
That's why I think you'll keep him. If Sandy is expecting a massive package for dickey well it's just not going happen.
I'm trying to be rude or anything but you guys seem like an organization that massively overvalues it's own players. Keeping Hairston because you guys were demanding an org top three prospect was lunacy imo.
We are aware of the ages of your guys. And both Lawrie and Gose are top quality ballplayers. I just wouldn't want Lawrie in a trade because we have sufficient infield depth. Don't get me wrong, if AA offered him up as part of a package, and the rest was there too, I'd grab him in a heartbeat.
You may not be a fan of Niese, but most GMs are. I think with Niese you'd still have 3 lefties in your rotation because he would push Happ out. But I do believe that AA is more interested in Dickey, realizing that a 38 yr old knuckleballer can still have several good years ahead. We may wind up keeping R.A. but if he is traded, he will bring back a very good package. (I'm not sure how you define massive, but he'll bring at least 1 top prospect, another in the #5-15 range, and probably one more lesser one.)
Keeping Hairston had nothing to do with what we were demanding. It had to do with what we were offered. Obviously, SA didn't think he was getting enough to part with Scott. That's not lunacy, it's good management.
Former B'klyn Dodger fan. Mets Maniac since 1962.