Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: Starting 5

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Jersey.
    Posts
    3,815
    vCash
    1500
    I agree with Bob that the Nets should keep moving with the current lineup, but in the future, I think it should become NJ Raven's lineup.

    MAR$WAG BROOKS

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    No, You Can't Invade My Butthole
    Posts
    12,907
    vCash
    1500
    only problem with blatche is that he's going to want a payday if he does decent this year.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Posts
    43,297
    vCash
    1675
    The thought of paying Blatche more than the min is scaring me.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    No, You Can't Invade My Butthole
    Posts
    12,907
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Robbw241 View Post
    The thought of paying Blatche more than the min is scaring me.
    you know he'll be good ol blatche come the end of the season and going into the offseason.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,299
    vCash
    1500
    if we play the heat, i think we should slide wallace to the 4....and match-up then get hump off the bench

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,913
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by netsgiantsyanks View Post
    only problem with blatche is that he's going to want a payday if he does decent this year.
    Blatche is already getting paid from the Wizards no one is going to offer more than what the Wiz are paying he will take the min

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,135
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Robbw241 View Post
    We would have too many backup bigs if we benched Hump. Someone would have to get moved.

    Crunch-time you were certainly see Wallace at the 4 though.
    Agreed. Plus I think we need Humps rebounding, we'd get destroyed on the glass if him or Evans aren't out there.
    Mikhail Prokhorov

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,142
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by netsgiantsyanks View Post
    or blatche.
    No reason to start Blatche, he has excelled at being the main scoring option with the second unit. I think it would definitely improve the lineup starting Evans at the 4. Hump is better offensively but we really don't need him on offense at all.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,476
    vCash
    1500
    do not overpay for blatche in offseason, he still shoots low percentage

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Yankees, Gmen, Nets
    Posts
    549
    vCash
    1500
    Starting Five

    PG - Deron Williams
    SG - Joe Johnson
    SF - Gerald Wallace
    PF - Kris Humphries
    C - Brook Lopez

    Andray Blatche, Marshon Brook, Reggie Evans, Keith Bogans, CJ Watson all contributing off the bench.

    This team is very good and very deep. They've gone on a nice run since losing back to back games in...

    Minnesota and Miami.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    9,693
    vCash
    1500
    wallace will split his minutes in half playing both forward position anyways....and brook is not affected by humpries starting, he's in the leaders scoring in the 1st quarter averaging 8 points per game...

  12. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    968
    vCash
    1500
    i like our starting line up. i feel like hump and evans should never be on the floor at the same time. and neither should lopez and blatche.


    lopez has been working on his D. which is much needed out of him. i dont mind his rebounding numbers b/c hump has been killing it on the boards.
    BBRRRROOOOOOOKKKKLLNNNNNNNNNNNNN

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    873
    vCash
    1500
    Our starting lineup was definately not as effective offensively against Sac. I know it is just one game and I didn't see if we were just missing open shots, but Brooks was 5-14. Lucky for us our "weak" bench out scored our starting lineup to provide our offensive punch in this game.
    Ballin-

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,361
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Ballin-Shhhh View Post
    Our starting lineup was definately not as effective offensively against Sac. I know it is just one game and I didn't see if we were just missing open shots, but Brooks was 5-14. Lucky for us our "weak" bench out scored our starting lineup to provide our offensive punch in this game.
    You mean Lopez. Brooks so far is shooting at 66.6%.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    873
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by iceteawithlemon View Post
    You mean Lopez. Brooks so far is shooting at 66.6%.
    Yes I meant to say Brook and not Brooks. However Brooks was not 66.6% in the Sac game he was 5-6 which is 83.3%.
    Ballin-

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •