Charles Barkley "At The End Of The Day, Nets Over Knicks"

[BBallfan8]

He's right. For a team thats been completely blown up they are off to a better/more impressive start. Should be 6-1.

Are you ****ing retarded? Or do you just pretend? Beating the Celtics in Brooklyn without Rondo is BY FAR the most impressive win the Nets have had... The Knicks have blown out 5 teams (including the heat) and just beat the Spurs in SA.

As the poster above me mentioned, they have 9 new players on their roster (including 3 new point guards!) and are still missing two of their starters.

Charles Barkley always hated the Knicks, he has a hard on for putting them down like Shaq does with Howard.

[ewing]

I think they are both 45 win teams and nothing more. Nets fans have no reason to back up their team right now so I'm only going to back up my Knicks point. Knicks fans need to talk to me at the end of 82 games. Your six game win streak means nothing to me right now as does every other record in the NBA. Talk to me in March when all of your veterans are tired, maybe even hurt, etc. The Knicks remind me a lot like the Celtics from the past two-three seasons. Off to great hot starts but will eventually slow down by mid-season because of age. Not to mention you have STAT coming back and unless he's coming off the bench he will most defiantly hurt your team. And do you guys really think you're going to be shooting like, 40% from three all year? I'm not sure of the exact stat line but the amount of threes you are making are unrealistic to do all year. Knicks are better than I thought they were, yes, but I will not say they are a championship contender.



I still say Knicks should trade STAT to Nets for Hump and fillers. win-win

Why would anyone want to talk to you after the season and why would you not reassess your opinion until the season is totally over?

[LongIslandIcedZ]

He's entitled to his opinion like every other analyst out there. He's become quite the notorious Knick hater for some reason, so his opinion means very little to me. Knicks are looking unbelievable right now and the combined records of teams the Knicks beat so far I imagine has to be pretty good.

I just dont see the Nets matching up well with the Knicks.

But we'll find out soon, the make-up game has to be soon.

[NYY 26 to 7]

I think they are both 45 win teams and nothing more. Nets fans have no reason to back up their team right now so I'm only going to back up my Knicks point. Knicks fans need to talk to me at the end of 82 games. Your six game win streak means nothing to me right now as does every other record in the NBA. Talk to me in March when all of your veterans are tired, maybe even hurt, etc. The Knicks remind me a lot like the Celtics from the past two-three seasons. Off to great hot starts but will eventually slow down by mid-season because of age. Not to mention you have STAT coming back and unless he's coming off the bench he will most defiantly hurt your team. And do you guys really think you're going to be shooting like, 40% from three all year? I'm not sure of the exact stat line but the amount of threes you are making are unrealistic to do all year. Knicks are better than I thought they were, yes, but I will not say they are a championship contender.

I still say Knicks should trade STAT to Nets for Hump and fillers. win-win

I would just like to point out that despite your other opinions that I think are just hate, you made this widly untrue statement about the Celtics. The Celtics the last 2 years had horrible 1st halves and lead to them almost trading away everyone before having amazing 2nd half play and getting back into the NBAs elite. This includes a 3-2 series lead over the Heat in the conf finals and if not for legendary LeBron performances in games 6 and 7 the C's are in the finals. So what are you talking about?

[NYY 26 to 7]

Kidd, camby, sheeeeeeed, brewer, felton, white, kurt thomas, copeland are all new to the team. JUST SAYING

And Prigs.

[waveycrockett]

9 out of the 13 active players for the Knicks right now are new to the team so they are still gelling also.

Ok this makes 4 years now knicks saying they need time to gel.

[waveycrockett]

Are you ****ing retarded? Or do you just pretend? Beating the Celtics in Brooklyn without Rondo is BY FAR the most impressive win the Nets have had... The Knicks have blown out 5 teams (including the heat) and just beat the Spurs in SA.

As the poster above me mentioned, they have 9 new players on their roster (including 3 new point guards!) and are still missing two of their starters.

Charles Barkley always hated the Knicks, he has a hard on for putting them down like Shaq does with Howard.

Nets didn't have Gerald Wallace, their best defender and one of their best rebounders and Marshon Brooks who is their 6th man. The game really wasn't close until the end either. Knicks core have all been together over a 1 year.

[SteBO]

Ok this makes 4 years now knicks saying they need time to gel.

Dude why does it even matter? As long as you get to a point where you're playing with cohesion on offense and in sync defensively in regards to the priniciples that you're trying to implement, who cares about how long it takes. This is what the regular season is for in many ways: to get a feel for your teammates, remain healthy, and develop good on-court habits for the postseason. Don't be mad just because the Knicks got their faster this year than BKN did.......

[SteBO]

Nets didn't have Gerald Wallace, their best defender and one of their best rebounders and Marshon Brooks who is their 6th man. The game really wasn't close until the end either. Knicks core have all been together over a 1 year.

Knicks don't have Iman Shumpert.....anything else? What you're saying is irrelevant dude. As of now, there is nothing the Nets have over NY in regards to where they are at this earlt stage of the season. One thing's for sure. NY @ BKN will be a fun game on Nov. 26.

And you're claim that the Knicks' core has been together for over a year is false.

Brewer
Thomas
Felton
Kidd
Camby

All are new to this team and are expected to contribute.

[waveycrockett]

Don't be mad just because the Knicks got their faster this year than BKN did.......

Umm actually thats not what happened at all. Knicks core been together over a year.

[LongIslandIcedZ]

Somebody picked up where DMF left off.

The Knicks have three new starters compared to last year, pretty sure the Nets have one.

Knicks have a brand new bench, so do the Nets.

I dont get the "Nets need to gel and the Knicks shouldnt have to."

Why cant certain Net fans just be happy they have a competitive team. Need to justify being better than the Knicks despite having a worse record and having an easier schedule.

I'm excited to have two basketball teams in the 5 boroughs, but man a couple of these Net fans make it tough.

[BKLYNpigeon]

NBA on TNT is going to suck when Charles Leaves.

[Giants #1 Fan]

It's more impressive. Knicks fans been talking about they need to "gel" for 3 years. Nets have started after 3 weeks.

[waveycrockett]

knicks don't have iman shumpert.....anything else? what you're saying is irrelevant dude. As of now, there is nothing the nets have over ny in regards to where they are at this earlt stage of the season. One thing's for sure. Ny @ bkn will be a fun game on nov. 26.

and???

[sharqstealth]

Keep coming haters keep coming...