Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    8,125
    vCash
    1750

    Question about WAR

    im starting to understand sabermetrics a little better than what i used too. But one question i have is when they are talking about WAR how do they determine who the replacement player is. For example, Andrew McCutchen, he had a 7.0 WAR this season, now how do they determine who is replacement is? The back up CF on the Pirates?
    Future Ace

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    St. Simon's Island
    Posts
    6,660
    vCash
    1500

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    8,125
    vCash
    1750
    Thanks man
    Future Ace

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    91
    vCash
    1500
    So there isn't one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Corning, NY
    Posts
    5,721
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by PhillyRocks View Post
    So there isn't one.
    There isn't what?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Littleton, Colorado
    Posts
    859
    vCash
    1500
    BR says to think 'AAAA' player as the standard to measure from.


    Batboy: Get a hit, Crash.
    Crash: Shut Up!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    St. Simon's Island
    Posts
    6,660
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Sweater View Post
    BR says to think 'AAAA' player as the standard to measure from.
    Yeah, that's pretty spot on.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Littleton, Colorado
    Posts
    859
    vCash
    1500
    I really enjoy glancing at saber stats since all players are measured from the same standard with 'so called' objective numbers, with no personal bias thrown in there.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/

    ^ Then you look at the career saber stat leaders and they are headed by a bunch of HOF'ers to give that saber stat some real to the game, substance.


    Batboy: Get a hit, Crash.
    Crash: Shut Up!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    36,928
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Sweater View Post
    I really enjoy glancing at saber stats since all players are measured from the same standard with 'so called' objective numbers, with no personal bias thrown in there.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/

    ^ Then you look at the career saber stat leaders and they are headed by a bunch of HOF'ers to give that saber stat some real to the game, substance.
    What I am loving about WAR is that it is very endless.

    You can rank by so many different kinds of WAR

    Baseball-Reference WAR (rWAR or bWAR)
    Fangraphs WAR (fWAR)
    WARP (Baseball-Prospectus)
    WPA (Win Probability Added, both Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference provide different calculations for this)
    JAWS (Jaffe War System, used for Hall of Fame analysis)
    Jpos (Jaffe but with Positional Adjustment)
    Bill James has his own Hall of Fame WAR metric
    And my own Net Runs Created (totaling Fangraphs RC, DRS, Positional Adjustment, and Base Running Value)
    Standard Win Curve Analysis

    The fact that there are so many options to measure snap-shot values tells you how strong the valuation has come, and how different people can interpret value subjectively.

    Some fans seem to think this diminishes the value of WAR (how can WAR be any good when it isn't universally agreed upon?). I feel the complete opposite. I think this shows the strength of it. That it was conceived upon, and has been consistently improved upon and re-worked by others looking to get closer to accurate. It will only continue to get better. Which is so fantastic.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •