| Sponsored Links |
|
|
If the Colts keep winning somehow and win 10 or 11 games. And Luck doesn't get some votes, I'd be surprised.
I went him to be a rebel.
Cue people posting his stats next to the other players on this list.
What's funny about it? Ryan doesn't have a great o-line, running game, or elite defense to take the pressure off and still has a better record than both, beating one on the field in a head to head matchup. He definitely has a legitimate case to be in the discussion -- the stats back it up and they are where they are right now mostly because of him.Originally Posted by bosox3431
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Peyton is the MVP. Watt and Rodgers are the only other cases I'm willing to listen to at this time. Maybe Brady if he has an awesome last few weeks.
We're better than you
And we know it
AP, record be damned.
Their defense may not be elite, but lets not pretend theyre not pretty good. 6th in points allowed, 7th in forced turnovers, above average pass defense(not great, not horrible either) bit their run defense is pretty bad. Yes the falcons do have a better record, theyve played a lot easier schedule too. They did beat the Broncos, and even though the defense created 4 turnovers they won by a measly 6 points. Defintly not a game won because of ryan. Everything else you have said can be said about all three teams for the most part, none of a great run game(all three teams average 3.8 yards per carry), packers oline isnt good and will likely get worst with bulaga out on ir. Ryan has had the better weapons this year too, yet statistically is behind both of them.
Im not saying ryan Isnt having a great year, he is, and by the end of the year could be the mvp. But right now, I have those two ahead of him and possibly AP.
I wouldn't disagree with AP. Dude is just ridiculous. Missing one game after tearing that ACL. WHat a joke.
I would say Rodgers or AP.
_____________
" Failure is only defined by someone's perception of what failing is."-His Airness
Just cause you know its coming doesnt make it invalid. Luck has a whole lot of potential and hes shown flashes of brilliance this year. But the fact is that he is in the bottom 5 or 10 in pretty much every passing category bar passing yards. And hes accumulated those yards with 57.5% completions. He has no business being in the MVP discussion at this point.
THE BAY IS BACK
Well I guess you're voting on the Most Outstanding Statistical Performance Player. I'm talking about the MVP? As in Most Valuable Player. It's not about stats.
That team did not believe they could win a game at times last year. They had no confidence. It was a can't do attitude. That has entirely changed.
I see 4 more wins there too. You nev er know they could get more. If they win 8 or 9 more games than next year, he SHOULD be in consideration despite the stats. I've never seen stats be so misleading towards a player anyways.
You laughed at the notion of Ryan being up there though. Then you're dissecting how they beat Denver to make the other guys look better, as if the other candidates have not barely scraped by good teams by or lost to teams that they should have handled fairly easily. All three teams have talented pass catchers. The Falcons defense has gotten by with forcing turnovers, I know you don't believe they have a better defense than the Broncos or Packers so I won't ask.Originally Posted by bosox3431
If you think Rodgers and Manning are superior to Ryan based on track record prior to this season, that's one thing and I agree with you. But to laugh at his 2012 credentials for an award based on the 2012 season is strange. There is a case for all of them. The laughter should be reserved for [insert other QB that everyone hyped up who hasn't quite lived up to expectations] because a lot of folks predicted the Falcons would finish last in the NFCS.
Last edited by Bravo95; 11-12-2012 at 11:28 PM.
John fox, for taking a chance on the better Manning.
"Expect the best. Be prepared for the worst. **** what others think. Do your own thing."
| Sponsored Links |
|
|