I'll do Current. No one even watched the early 90s. You cant just go based on stats all the time and no eye test.
I'll do Current. No one even watched the early 90s. You cant just go based on stats all the time and no eye test.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Current.
Too many what Ifs
You already know I'm down for current
id do current
What team would you like (List top 3): I don't care
Do you want a co? Yes
Would you be willing to be an assistant? I guess so
Previous PSD games experience: Never done a football redraft, but have done NFL redrafts and mocks. I'd basically want to be a Co with anyone that'll have me, kind of using this to help "broaden my horizons" and knowledge in the world of football.
Describe TO with no limit of the # of words you can use and the minimum being 5: I can't describe you but I have terrific arm stamina and versatility, so I'm positive I could provide excellent Dutch rudders.
Lulz I'm such a noob.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
I'd be down if were doing 90's I'd need a co if it's current I can rock a team by myself
Minneapolis Muskies 90's Redraft
Mark Price -- Richard Hamilton -- Mark Aguirre -- Tim Duncan -- Joe Carroll
I guess we should do current. Seems like well have more people. But if we do we should at least consider doing the 2 players per country rule.
I need an assistant or co.
Too many what Ifs
You should have never given us a the power to decide what type of re-draft we want to do. It takes forever to get us all to agree and we always end up doing a current re-draft.
We should always have one regular re-draft and one all-time re-draft every year. I enjoy doing the all-time re-drafts because they present a challenge. Doing current re-draft after current re-draft gets really boring.
#TeamSachs
1 player limit on each club team? that would make things way more interesting. Or maybe 2 player limit. We always do the same thing and we need a co-commish, cuz TO kind of sucks (well not kind of, he does a lot).
We're doing current re-draft.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|