Hmm, dont recall Calling you crazy....
I said Ive watched both of them and Hundley is a more natural talent.
Im noticing how your cherry picking stats to build a case.
BCS changes dramatically with each loss so using that instead of AP or coaches poll is a very obvious reach.As well as the fact that 7 pac 10 teams have lost to each other knocking them out of the top 25.
There are no south eastern luisiana poly techs in the pac 10 to get fat on.
Im not interested in rushing stats or team records.
Im talking about the individual acomplishments of the players thus far.UCLA is far from stacked offensively, their leading rusher isnt even projected to go higher then the 4th rd next year.
they dont have a reciever that will be drafted either,
they have one kid a TE and Hundley hardly goes to him.
this is bretts very first college snap:
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://w...-mhmhG3AUD2UWA
lastly ,you seem to be a seasoned poster here....I dont get where the 6th grade response comes from.
Ive watched both kids closely and I think Hundley is better....you dont have to, you can think what you want, only time will tell.
so Hundley has a higher passer rating,more TDs,a better completion percentage