This is the way I look at it.

We may have not "deserved" to win it...but what gives the Warriors any reason that they did??

They shot just as ****** as we did (38.2 to 38.1 from the field), shot just as ****** from the FT line (60.9 to 59.3), just as many TO's as us (14 to 15). Only thing they did significantly better was shoot from 3 (36% to 20.8%).

So it can be said that we didn't deserve to win...but not like the warriors played any better.

So in a game of overall ****** can be warranted to say that the team that played less ****** deserved to win..