Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 103
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    41,525
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by sota4ever View Post
    how old will hilary be in 4 years?
    69.

    EBOLA EBOLA EBOLA

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    43,277
    vCash
    7100
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckwheat View Post
    I like Warren.

    Pelosi would def. be a better example.
    Hah, why?
    On Cam Newton:

    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    So it's official.

    This jerk off is going to be the first QB taken in the first round (or maybe the first 5) in the modern era to throw less than 300 passes at DI level. and he might go #1 overall.


    hahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Nfl scouting is a joke.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    41,525
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by homestarunner93 View Post
    Hah, why?
    I read her book "The Two Income Trap", to be honest It was a good read and I have nothing else to back up my opinion of her. Is she crazy?

    EBOLA EBOLA EBOLA

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    29,168
    vCash
    1500
    If Hilary runs Bill and Barack will be all over the country helping her. There would be no way she loses.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Superior, WI
    Posts
    17,012
    vCash
    1213
    Quote Originally Posted by metsbulls1025 View Post
    If Hilary runs Bill and Barack will be all over the country helping her. There would be no way she loses.
    that probably depends on what happens in the next four years.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Northwest Indiana
    Posts
    170
    vCash
    1500
    My man Mitch! Current Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels for Republican Party in 2016.

    I wish he would have ran this year, Romney would have stood no chance against him for the Republican nomination. Republican Party wanted Daniels as there nominee badly, much better option then Romney.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,982
    vCash
    1500
    Chris Christie is a traitor. He didn't have to slobber all over Obama's knob like a juicy steak every time ( two weeks ago)he was in front of the media.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by justinnum1
    Wade will be a lot better next season now that he got knee surgery. Hate on. - 7/31/2012

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,982
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by dbroncos78087 View Post
    You really don't have a great track record in predictions. Might want to check your internal biases.
    That was one election.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by justinnum1
    Wade will be a lot better next season now that he got knee surgery. Hate on. - 7/31/2012

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Baltimore now, but born and raised on the south side of Chicago.
    Posts
    7,217
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Longhornfan1234 View Post
    Chris Christie is a traitor. He didn't have to slobber all over Obama's knob like a juicy steak every time ( two weeks ago)he was in front of the media.
    This is what is wrong with MOST politicians in general. If this is some sort of game where party means more than getting things done then sure this is brilliant. But if getting **** done is more important... and telling the truth about what is getting done than anyone with this attitude is treating the political system with the level of respect due a sporting event. And as much as I love sports, it's just ****ing silly.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrPoon
    man with hair like fire can destroy souls with a twitch of his thighs.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    40,047
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by flips333 View Post
    This is what is wrong with MOST politicians in general. If this is some sort of game where party means more than getting things done then sure this is brilliant. But if getting **** done is more important... and telling the truth about what is getting done than anyone with this attitude is treating the political system with the level of respect due a sporting event. And as much as I love sports, it's just ****ing silly.
    I have no problem with what Christie did. I do think it helped Obama some, and Sandy helped Obama. But it was it is, and I highly doubt without Sandy he wouldn't have still won. Christie spoke honestly about the president. It's ok in my opinion
    Therefore he doesn't exist
    So poof...vamoose son of a b itch

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Baltimore now, but born and raised on the south side of Chicago.
    Posts
    7,217
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by behindmydesk View Post
    I have no problem with what Christie did. I do think it helped Obama some, and Sandy helped Obama. But it was it is, and I highly doubt without Sandy he wouldn't have still won. Christie spoke honestly about the president. It's ok in my opinion
    That's my point. When it becomes wrong to just speak honestly because the truth isn't something that locks in step with the party line then we have a bigger problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrPoon
    man with hair like fire can destroy souls with a twitch of his thighs.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    19,669
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by flea View Post
    It's an interesting thought exercise, and it probably would be litigated since this is America, but in my opinion what I said would happen. On face, the text is pretty clear (like your link says). This always holds a significant amount of sway, but since it's the Supreme Court we're talking about we have to realize that they don't really feel obligated to follow the text or reasoning of anything if they don't want to.

    The only real snag would be the fact that the 22nd Amendment says "elected more than twice." A strict reading would seem to indicate that a VP would not get into the White House via election but rather succession. However, I think the Supreme Court would take a broader understanding of "elected" since all VPs are elected as part of a ticket. Thus, the VP would be indirectly elected into the office of President. However, I don't think this is a bar on VP's being elected despite being ineligible to succeed since the 22nd Amendment says nothing about VP eligibility.

    So there's my prediction for the logic, and the real reason I think that's the way it would go is because the Supreme Court avoids constitutional issues if a remedy can be fashioned in another way. This interpretation would be effectively splitting the baby - allowing the former President to serve in an office since there is no explicit bar on that while also disallowing his succession.

    But that's just one guy's opinion. Guessing what the Supreme Court will do is like guessing what Gwyneth Paltrow will name her next kid.
    Great post, and I absolutely agree with you

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,805
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by behindmydesk View Post
    I have no problem with what Christie did. I do think it helped Obama some, and Sandy helped Obama. But it was it is, and I highly doubt without Sandy he wouldn't have still won. Christie spoke honestly about the president. It's ok in my opinion
    This 100%. Since when is actually putting the people you govern ahead of politics a bad thing. I think the storm did help Obama, but there's not much you can do about that.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    6,692
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by b1e9a8r5s View Post
    This 100%. Since when is actually putting the people you govern ahead of politics a bad thing. I think the storm did help Obama, but there's not much you can do about that.
    You think some Republican primary voters would hold it against him?

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,805
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Labgrownmangoat View Post
    You think some Republican primary voters would hold it against him?
    I think it's possible. But the primaries aren't for 3 years. Right now, people are upset about the loss and Christie is, unjustly IMO, taking some heat. I think if people step back and look at it in a few years, there won't be as much animosity. And at the end of the day, the Republicans need someone who can win.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •