Stubbs only hit 20 once and he did that laying in a pretty hitting friendly park. His value is essentially the same as Torres was, but yes he will hit more homers.
Stubbs only hit 20 once and he did that laying in a pretty hitting friendly park. His value is essentially the same as Torres was, but yes he will hit more homers.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Agreed. Idk what they'd trade Dickey for to be honest. It's a tough call cause I'm not really sure we'd get fair value.
Well they wouldn't be very good this season but going forward it has a chance to be very good.
I agree. The problem with trading Dickey is that I doubt we'd get fair value back because of his age
Sorry double post
What if arredondo was included plus one of their top pitching prospects like Robert Stephenson or Tony Cingrani, we'll throw in Ramirez for a change of scenery guy for them.
Dickey for Billy Hamilton and Homer Bailey. That I would do.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Again, I must disagree, courteously.
A 38-year-old knuckleballer is the equivalent of a 30-year-old in normal pitcher years.
At least.
Dickey has as many as 5 solid prime years left. To your point, Niese might have more but he doesn't have anywhere near the upside Dickey has. Dickey is ace material. Niese is a good middle-of-the-rotation.
Point is, Niese is not nor will he ever be the ace that Dickey is now and will be for maybe as many as the next 5 seasons.
As much as I like Jonathan Niese, I'm not ready to depend on him nearly as much as I would Robert Allen.
Now the Zen master says, "We'll see."
Hamilton has blazing speed, obviously, but I'm not sure if he'd ever be a good major league hitter. He did have an impmressive average in A+ ball in 2012 and hit a little lower in AA, but still pretty good, but again, I don't know if he can ever be a good hitting leadoff guy. The dude will make it just because of his speed though.
I don't think he'll be the same at age 38 as he was at age 37, if only because he is probably the front runner to capture the Cy Young award and the Knuckler is so enigmatic that it's hard to project the following year being anything close.
That said, I think it wouldn't be realistic to see him post a trend of something like this over the next few years. Speaking from an ERA standpoint.
2013: 3.30
2014: 3.60
2015: 3.80-3.90
2016: 4.1
2017: 4.3
Maybe it won't be that dramatic, or maybe he'll continue to excel, but he has gotten better with each passing year he has been in Flushing. I see no reason to believe that he's just going to dramatically drop off initially.
www.DailyStache.net You Gotta Believe
R.I.P UAPeople
| Sponsored Links |
|
|