Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 56 of 56
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17,938
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaBelieve View Post
    Agreed. I just think there is a lack of clear direction when you hold on to guys like Hairston and Rauch while simulataneously taking the "wait until 2014" approach.

    Alderson deserves some criticism for that.
    He does, and of his 3 multi-year deals, the Frankie Frank deal hasn't worked out so far. But then again that was for 12 million.

    You could also give him crap for not trying to trade Capuano at last year's trading deadline, but seriously who were we going to get.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    17,385
    Translation= Two Pieces of ****, one of which will still be on the Mets roster come 2013.
    Comin at ya homie!

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    25,304
    Quote Originally Posted by Sick Of It All View Post
    They kept Churrasco on the 40 man roster and Batista over him, again an example of bad roster management. Yeah we know all the issues with Martinez inability to stay healthy, but to keep bums like those 2 over a 23 y/o kid with some upside was pretty brutal.
    THIS.

    It's not about whether Duda or FMart will ever turn out to be the real deal. It's why they wanted C and B over F-Mart.

    Apparently mediocre major leaguers are more important to this organization than minor leaguers with upsides.


    Now the Zen master says, "We'll see."

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1955
    Posts
    25,011
    FoC, it's because choices C and D were APHs.

    APHs are the one consistent theme of this organization now.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17,938
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaBelieve View Post
    FoC, it's because choices C and D were APHs.

    APHs are the one consistent theme of this organization now.
    But are these APHs PBTB?

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17,938
    Quote Originally Posted by vtmet View Post
    could they have gotten a AAA catcher out of either one of them? I'm not talking a stud catching prospect...just a guy that could handle MLB pitchers, and not hit .190 with no power...
    That's a good question.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1955
    Posts
    25,011
    Quote Originally Posted by clayamtion View Post
    But are these APHs PBTB?
    Of course they are clay.

    What a silly question.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    25,304
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaBelieve View Post
    FoC, it's because choices C and D were APHs.

    APHs are the one consistent theme of this organization now.
    Sigh.


    Now the Zen master says, "We'll see."

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    25,304
    Quote Originally Posted by clayamtion View Post
    But are these APHs PBTB?
    APHs by their very definition are PsBTB.


    Now the Zen master says, "We'll see."

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17,938
    Quote Originally Posted by fanofclendennon View Post
    APHs by their very definition are PsBTB.
    Sometimes you need to ask a Bishop for clarification.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    25,304
    Quote Originally Posted by clayamtion View Post
    Sometimes you need to ask a Bishop for clarification.
    Always glad to help, as long as I have internet access.


    Now the Zen master says, "We'll see."

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •