His d is fantastic, so our defence would be better.
His size for rebounds would have been a real plus. So other teams would look like giants rebounding over us.
He a vet, he's a vet that can play, not a vet on the bench, Add stability, although not a true leader, he could help in a small role, and so many other things that would really help this team.
We need quality starters not bench players. Our bench is on par with our starters. That's not good.
Off the bench
Wouldn't that be better? I think alot better.
Last edited by sneak; 01-29-2013 at 08:08 PM.
Where's trob? Trob would have been harrison barnes.
Maybe I'm on a rant. But I really hated that move. Not to slight hayes, he has been great for us. But it's done, over and we can't go back. But I really feel that we would have been a much better player with him. Just my opinion, witch can't really be proved eighter way. This all started with fab melo, he's not sammy d. But I would love another 7' next to cuz. That's all, can you feel my pain?
Last edited by sneak; 01-29-2013 at 08:13 PM.
Wolves get Tyreke
Kings get Shved and Buddinger
https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/st...46706006077441ESPN sources say Dallas is other prime landing spot for Calderon, but I'm told Mavs reluctant to part with SF that Grizz want: Vince Carter
"He's a hell of a player. I think he's the best quarterback in this game." Andre Johnson said about Andrew Luck
I would rather keep Walmons and have a bad contract than trade Walmons for a half-season rental. Not like we're pushing for the playoffs. We'd basically be trading Walmons for nothing.
I know his contract is bad, but he's one of the only guys he have that we can depend on every night.
And Calderon makes, what, $10 Mill. this year?? We'd have to overpay him to keep him. Meaning like $12-$13 Mill. a year contract for 3-4 years?? Hell nah!!! PASS!!!