
Originally Posted by
mlisica19
I chose Iginla the same reason Canada, babcock and yzerman chose him. Experience, physical, skilled and a 30 goal scorer.
I chose Callahan because hes one of the best in the world in what he does. Penalty killing, blocking shots. Its tempting to go for more skilled players in JT and Kessel or who have you but Callys role is important in winning games. leadership and USA silver medalist.
I chose Kane, though kessel would be valuable player too, but kane is use to playing with Toewes. I also chose Kane cuz hes faster which might be valuable against the Europeans.
Pietrangelo... i rarely ever got to see him play, but i know hes good. Offensive tho and i think babcock (after who he chose for his defense) he would want big well rounded players like Johnson.
Eric Staal was another guy I was thinking about but due to chemistry I left him out.
Europeans... hmmm Idk how Malkin and Ovi would fare off. have they played on each others lines in Russia? i dont think so especially after some issues in the NHL they have had. I dont think Malkins style would fit ovis well either... Malkin likes the puck possession, Ovi loves having it too but shoots at every chance he gets. Idk for sure but i left him off most other lines cuz of chemistry. When i brought in Bakcstrom, i knew it would work. but that duo does not fair well against Sedins, Malkins, or Datsyuk... hense why i left them on the 4th. No doubt you will still see him on the PP and just cuz hes on the 4th line does not mean he willl lose much playing time. and Enstrom instead of Volchenkov... okay i see that only cuz Enstrom is a better puck mover