View Poll Results: Add a 27th Round?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    13 72.22%
  • No (please explain why)

    5 27.78%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: A 27th Round

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Canadian In Michigan.
    Posts
    41,305

    A 27th Round

    Quote Originally Posted by jetsforever View Post
    I think I might just add a 27th round. That way, it isn't fair to people who invested in a fullback and it allows people to have a nickel corner, second running back, slot receiver and fullback. I think that seems fair. I can make a poll.
    How do you guys feel about this? That way, we are all on level playing field and all can have a nickel corner, backup running back, fullback and slot receiver whereas the other way, one of those positions will be missing guaranteed.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,152
    I say add another round.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6,593
    I think there will be a lot of pissing and moaning, but its a good chance for teams to fill some holes even though the pool of talent available is pretty low.


    "its sad when theres actual evidence Ziggy is 28" - John Walls Era

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    29,654
    yea i could care less. More people will complain, but w/e I don't care.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Arvada, Colorado
    Posts
    15,623
    We could get a punter, so that would be sweat. Given, I haven't moaned.
    You're talking to me all wrong... It's the wrong tone. You do it again and I'll stab you in the face with a soldering iron. Hey, tell me, does your mother sew? BOOM. Get her to sew that!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,759
    Tha'd be mighty gracious of yous, massuh.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Valencia, California
    Posts
    14,555
    If you are going to allow a 27th player you'll need to be specific on how we can use the 27th player.

    Can teams add a 4th WR? a 4th CB? etc.

    BALTIMORE RAVENS
    2012-2013
    SUPER BOWL XLVII CHAMPS

    "Came from the bottom, prayed to be a champ; Did it on our own nobody gave us a chance; No matter the odds keep God in our circle; Now every time it rain, we turn the whole world PURPLE;
    PURPLE REIGN"
    - King Los

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    8,740
    It sounds like it would be that every team has this format:
    1 QB
    2 RBs
    1 FB
    3 WRs
    1 TE
    5 O-Linemen

    3-4 D-Linemen
    3-4 LBs (with these totaling 7)
    3 CBs
    1 FS
    1 SS

    1 P
    1 K


    Miami HEAT and Baltimore Ravens TM

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by PocketKings View Post
    If you are going to allow a 27th player you'll need to be specific on how we can use the 27th player.

    Can teams add a 4th WR? a 4th CB? etc.
    The point (from what I gather) is that everyone has the same positions filled, so we avoid things like this.

    And I'm fine with the idea
    SPACE


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    ****ing Bruges
    Posts
    30,787
    So I can't take a secodn TE>?
    Detroit Wolverines


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    30,984
    Yeah, just because there is another player I want

    Julio Jones, the reason gravity is only a theory



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Canadian In Michigan.
    Posts
    41,305
    I mean I think a nickel back, slot receiver, fullback and second running back are all pretty important players no? One of those positions can't be had with the current format.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    30,984
    Or a nickle rusher

    Julio Jones, the reason gravity is only a theory



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    ****ing Bruges
    Posts
    30,787
    I feel bad for the elephant in the room
    Detroit Wolverines


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Conroe, TX
    Posts
    18,892
    No! We've been back and forth on this and I've already had to change a pick because of this. We were 26, then 27 for two days and then everyone was settled on 26. That extra player will make absolutely no difference one way or the other in the long run, and I see no reason to add another round yet again.

    Keep it 26 and just lighten up on the FB rule and that will stop everyone's *****ing.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmer55 View Post
    The Lakers are still going to the finals and you can bookmark this post. Kobe is going to will them.
    Quote Originally Posted by nickdymez View Post
    I also forgot to add that I think J.R Smith is better than Kobe too. I'd even add Curry and Randolph. You know what now that i think about it Kobe might not even be in the top 15 this year.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •