Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Which would you rather build around

Voters
70. You may not vote on this poll
  • Troy Tulowitzki

    22 31.43%
  • Hanley Ramirez

    48 68.57%
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 84

Thread: Hanley or Tulo?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    3,509
    vCash
    1500

    Hanley or Tulo?

    If your starting a team and can only choose one which is it?

    Both are young athletic and have a world of talent.


    I'd take Tulo. Tulo has a cannon and plays good defense, it is a toss up offensively.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    15,562
    vCash
    1500
    It's Hanely, for sure. Put Tulo in Florida's pitchers park and Hanley in Colorado's hitters park and it wouldn't even be a comparison.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    16,037
    vCash
    1500
    Hanley and it's not even close.

    HEAT
    Spurs
    Marlins
    Dolphins
    Eagles
    Gators


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    3,509
    vCash
    1500
    I'm kind of shocked that yall don't think it's even close, I'd consider this a toss up..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    San Diego, California, United States
    Posts
    7,543
    vCash
    1500
    No way. Hanley is the only guy in the game who can challenge Pujols as possibly the best all-around complete player in the game. No one else compares with Hanley.

    TOSS UP!? No.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    52,937
    vCash
    1500
    hanley without question
    30 Team Stadium Checklist: 10 to go

    1) Yankees 2) Orioles 3) Rays 4) Red Sox 5) Mets 6) Braves 7) Phillies 8) Nationals 9) Marlins 10) Pirates 11) Padres 12) Astros 13) Mariners 14) Twins 15) Cubs 16) White Sox 17) Cardinals 18) Indians 19) Tigers 20) Royals

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cliffside Park, NJ
    Posts
    37,433
    vCash
    1500
    Hanley and it's not even close. Outside of this year, Hanley has been a top 5 MLB player the 2 previous seasons and he's just entering his prime.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Big Smoke
    Posts
    669
    vCash
    1500
    Hanley.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    14,453
    vCash
    1500
    Even with Hanley being a terrible defensive player he still gets the nod.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    LA-NY and all in between
    Posts
    695
    vCash
    1500
    Hanley
    MLB Stadiums: 12-30
    Sorry everyone i am a POOR SPELLER

    Quote Originally Posted by sfattahian View Post
    I can't believe people think he is on roids. You must be the same people that actually think OJ Simpson was guilty.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    39,166
    vCash
    1500
    I certainly think it's a lot closer than what people think. But still Hanley.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    3,174
    vCash
    1500
    Tulo because of the defense, that means a lot a SS. Plus he can hit.
    Suck it

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,914
    vCash
    1500
    Hanley is not terrible defensively, he's above average...

    This is not a good comparison...

    Kobe vs. VC in it's NBA counterpart...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    3,174
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by footballer2369 View Post
    Hanley is not terrible defensively, he's above average...

    This is not a good comparison...

    Kobe vs. VC in it's NBA counterpart...
    Over the past three years, he is the 3rd worst defensive SS, this year he is the worst. His value of his 5 full seasons is -37. So he is a -7.4. That is not good at all. Over the last three years, Tulo is +5.5 and for his career is 20.8 for his career (counting his full seasons, not his rookie year of 25 games).
    Suck it

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    3,174
    vCash
    1500
    Tulowitzki is better by a wide margin in the field and the bat is close. To me I still would take Tulowitzki but it is not an easy decision.
    Suck it

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •