Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 79

Thread: Montana/Marino

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,964

    Montana/Marino

    Just curious, How do you think each QB would have faired if they had switched the situation (Marino in SF/Montana in MIA)

    How many SB's would each of them have (if any)?

    Do you think Marino would be higher than Montana in peoples minds?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,261

    Montana/Marino

    Does anyone know what a comparison thread is? I love all this garbage in the main forum

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos_Sports4Life View Post
    Just curious, How do you think each QB would have faired if they had switched the situation (Marino in SF/Montana in MIA)

    How many SB's would each of them have (if any)?

    Do you think Marino would be higher than Montana in peoples minds?
    Marino - Depends. Those 49ers SB teams were pretty balanced offensively. Would Marino be willing to sacrifice stats for postseason success? I know Marino says he would now, but I'm not so sure he would back then.

    Montana - None. The 49ers were an absolute juggernaut when they fielded complete teams. When they had poor running games and suspect defenses? Not so much. I don't see Montana winning a SB in this situation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ja-Blam
    Posts
    4,928
    Quote Originally Posted by DRS172 View Post
    Montana - None. The 49ers were an absolute juggernaut when they fielded complete teams. When they had poor running games and suspect defenses? Not so much. I don't see Montana winning a SB in this situation.
    I have to disagree here.

    Joe Montana went to the Chiefs and took them to the AFC Championship game. That was as a 37/38 year old coming off major injuries. Both years with the Chiefs he didn't have a 1,000 yd back (nor a starting HB who averaged 4.0+ YPC). When they went to the AFC title game the defense was 14th in the league...

    Montana won wherever he went, I think it'd be foolish to say he couldn't have won with the Dolphins.
    Quote Originally Posted by AmsterNat View Post
    How unsurprising. Dude, give up trying to argue with valade. He cut you into little pieces, had you for breakfast, and shat you out.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,299
    Marino would have won about 7 super bowls. Montana could have gotten far, but i don't think he would have won.
    Last edited by Big Zo; 08-13-2012 at 03:10 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,064
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    I have to disagree here.

    Joe Montana went to the Chiefs and took them to the AFC Championship game. That was as a 37/38 year old coming off major injuries. Both years with the Chiefs he didn't have a 1,000 yd back (nor a starting HB who averaged 4.0+ YPC). When they went to the AFC title game the defense was 14th in the league...

    Montana won wherever he went, I think it'd be foolish to say he couldn't have won with the Dolphins.
    Montana didn't have a terrible running game or defense with the Chiefs. They were actually pretty average in most categories.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    ****ing Bruges
    Posts
    30,785
    Montana would have found a way to win Atleast 1. But Marino would probably have won Atleast once, maybe twice
    Detroit Wolverines


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Elgin, IL
    Posts
    3,488
    The 49ers were a stacked team. I mean, Jerry Rice as your wide receiver? Marino would have won super bowls there. I don't think Montana would have won in Miami just because the teams weren't as talented.
    Last edited by ChicagoJ; 08-13-2012 at 04:20 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ja-Blam
    Posts
    4,928
    Quote Originally Posted by DRS172 View Post
    Montana didn't have a terrible running game or defense with the Chiefs. They were actually pretty average in most categories.
    2 Things.

    1) Yes they would be considered average, but it's still impressive he took that team to the AFC Title game at 37 coming off 3 solid years of injuries.

    2) It's not as if the Dolphins weren't average themselves for parts of Marino's tenure. Here are their defensive ranks:

    1983: 1st

    1984: 7th

    1985: 12th

    1990: 4th

    1992: 11th

    1995: 10th

    The Chiefs defense in Montana's 2 years were 14th and 7th. Their Rushing game was 20th and 11th.

    I think Montana could've done at least what Marino did with the Dolphins, with the possibility of actually winning a Superbowl.

    One thing I guarantee, Montana was not simply good due to the system...
    Quote Originally Posted by AmsterNat View Post
    How unsurprising. Dude, give up trying to argue with valade. He cut you into little pieces, had you for breakfast, and shat you out.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ja-Blam
    Posts
    4,928
    Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoJ View Post
    The 49ers were a stacked team. I mean, Jerry Rice as your wide receiver? Marino would have won super bowls there. I don't think Montana would have won in Miami just because the teams weren't as talented.
    In 1981 and 1984? Care to check again?
    Quote Originally Posted by AmsterNat View Post
    How unsurprising. Dude, give up trying to argue with valade. He cut you into little pieces, had you for breakfast, and shat you out.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by mikebrez bears/ View Post
    Does anyone know what a comparison thread is? I love all this garbage in the main forum
    You sure seem to complain a lot.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos_Sports4Life View Post
    Just curious, How do you think each QB would have faired if they had switched the situation (Marino in SF/Montana in MIA)

    How many SB's would each of them have (if any)?

    Do you think Marino would be higher than Montana in peoples minds?
    I don't about all that, I do know I'd rather have Joe Montana than Dan Marino.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,843
    Well, IMO, Don Shula was absolutley lost with Marino and could never figure out how to build a team around him. With Montana, I believe Shula would have built a more balanced team and won Superbowls with Montana

    Bill Walsh would have scaled back Marino's attempts and kept the game balanced with Craig, Rathman and Company. Marino in the WCO would have been interesting. He wasn't as mobile as Montana so he certainly would have taken more hits in a dominant NFC.

    Both would have won Superbowls IMO. Walsh however, I believe would have done a much better job building a balanced team with Marino than Shula did. Shula likely would have been better off coaching a Montana led team than Marino.
    .
    re; Tim Tebow

    Originally Posted by j11430

    His arm strength has never been his problem.
    Pinstripe power

    pulinlgn a flacco is menaigles,s arguemenst
    English is optional?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,064
    Quote Originally Posted by valade16 View Post
    2) It's not as if the Dolphins weren't average themselves for parts of Marino's tenure.
    Here are the defensive rankings for their starting years ...

    Montana
    81 - 2nd
    82 - 23rd
    83 - 4th
    84 - 1st
    85 - 2nd
    86 - 3rd
    87 - 3rd
    88 - 8th
    89 - 3rd
    90 - 2nd
    93 - 14th
    94 - 7th

    That's ten top 10 defenses in twelve seasons. And an average ranking of 6. Montana had only one season with a bottom 10 defense, and what happens that year? His team is awful and doesn't even make it to the playoffs.

    Now let's look at Marino's defenses...

    83 - 1st
    84 - 7th
    85 - 12th
    86 - 26th
    87 - 16th
    88 - 24th
    89 - 22nd
    90 - 4th
    91 - 24th
    92 - 11th
    93 - 24th
    94 - 17th
    95 - 10th
    96 - 17th
    97 - 16th
    98 - 1st
    99 - 19th

    Despite playing more seasons, Marino has only five top 10 defenses. And they had an average ranking of 15. He also had five bottom 10 defenses. There's really no comparison who had the better deal. And this is just the defenses. Can you imagine if we were comparing running games? Receiving cores? Coaching? Montana has him beat across the board.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Down Yonder
    Posts
    7,256
    It is impossible to say. 2 completely different offences. One took brains and precision the other took a big arm and down the field. There is no way to know if either could play in the others system.

    That's My Boy.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •