
Originally Posted by
trout1627
Unless I am missing something, your point is that there are nine other players who are more efficient offensively based on pure statistical analysis. Assuming you are correct, I don't see any other player who is available who can give us more than Melo does. So if Melo is #10, #15, or #20 by your statistical analysis, it does not matter to me. I am happy that Melo is a Knick. That is not blind love. That is factual reality. Now if someone asked me if I would trade Melo for Lebron, that would be different. But we all know that is not happening.
That being said, I agree with you that statistics are important, but I do not believe that statistics show everything because they can be influences by outside circumstances. For example: Let's assume that we all agree that Chris Paul is the best point guard in the NBA currently. His career assists per game are 9.8. Last year it was 9.1. Does this mean that he has deteriorated? That he was a better point guard with New Orleans than with the Clippers? Or perhaps this means that he is on a better team now with more players who can pass the ball, so he has just a few less opportunities.
Likewise, is it possible that some of Melo's stats are skewed becasue he was always expected to carry the offense even if it was a bad shot. Now that he is on a team with more shooters (hopefully), will better shot selection increase his efficiency? Shot selection is not always up to the shooter. It depends on whether there is anyone else on the floor who can shoot.
As I said, stats are important. But I think one has to keep an open mind regarding possible factors that are skewing the stats.