He was the best QB in the NFL last season, and he did a superb job of executing Mike McCarthy's system. With that said, Mike McCarthy's system is a permutation of the "West Coast" offense, which is about as user-friendly as you can get for a QB, and the WRs are perfect fits for the system as well. I've said before that the success of Green Bay's offense is equal parts Rodgers, his supporting cast, and the system, and I'm sticking by that assessment.

Originally Posted by
posner08
I think a realistic avg for Rodgers for the next few years (if healthy) is somewhere around 4000-4200 yards, 35-40 TDs in the air, a couple on the ground and 8-12 picks. He's accurate, can move around, has a great, deep receiving corps, and no running back. He's also a smart signal caller who's on the right side of 30, and rarely makes stupid plays. Yes, I'm a Packer fan - but yes, Aaron Rodgers is that good.
This is what I mean when I say that Rodgers has maxed out. He's not going to have 45 TD passes or a passer rating in the 120's every year. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if he never does that again. But that doesn't mean he's in decline. He can still throw 35 TD passes and have a passer rating in the high 100's and be a damn good QB, and possibly lead the Packers to another Super Bowl championship or two.
Last edited by DBR96A; 08-01-2012 at 12:45 PM.
"We're a game-plan offense, and we're going to try to tailor our strengths against their weaknesses."
-Todd Haley, current Steelers offensive coordinator
"We're not going to change what we do regardless of who our opponent is or who's injured."
-Bruce Arians, former Steelers offensive coordinator