Visit my Blog.
"A Republican is apparently someone who thinks people choose to be poor, unemployed and on food stamps because it's easy and FUN!" - @LOLGOP
...and the Muslim chef is not forced to eat the pork, only provide it for those that want to.Originally Posted by natepro
If he didn't want to offer legal food, he shouldn't have gotten into the restaurant business!
If someone uses a hypothetical (even if it is unlikely) to demonstrate a principle: "but that wouldn't happen" is not a response.Originally Posted by natepro
Especially when you provided an example of a town having only one pharmacist. Now, if that one pharmacist decides to stop being a pharmacist...what then? Should the government force someone living in the town to become a pharmacist?
And you didn't answer my question. I sincerely want to know. What are pharmacists forced to provide? I am not aware of how they are regulated.
Last edited by gcoll; 07-23-2012 at 11:21 PM.
As I read what I wrote I realize that these arguments is a Ouroboros http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros... which for pharmacy is kind of appropriate. We are actually all arguing the same things we just stand behind different folks.
Last edited by flips333; 07-24-2012 at 09:36 AM.
Originally Posted by MrPoon
Quitting a job and seeking other employment seems like a radical step for something so easy to obtain as birth control. And, it can be tough to find a job that offers any medical coverage, let alone one tailored to your specific demands.
And I maintain that we are arguing very different principles. "The government should force businesses to offer birth control coverage in their health care packages" is based on a very different principle than what I base my thinking on. You're very very rarely going to see me support government force to reach a result I prefer.