Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Better HITTER, Drew vs. Ichiro (Read stats)

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • JD Drew

    7 43.75%
  • Ichiro

    9 56.25%
  • It's EXTREMELY close

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,435
    vCash
    1500

    Ichiro Vs. Drew Hitting

    Ok, I'm going STRICTLY hitting...

    Which would score More runs, 9 JD Drews vs. 9 Ichiro's, Here's a few stats...

    Im asking because I was called a "stat geek" and a "moron" for picking JD Drew as the better HITTER. Again, not factoring in fielding.


    Ichiro

    Basic

    AVG- .323
    OBP- .366
    SLG- .418
    OPS- .784

    Advanced

    wOBA- .345
    wRC+ (Runs Created/Park adjusted) 114


    JD Drew

    Basic

    AVG- .278 (45 points worse)
    OBP- .384 (18 points higher)
    SLG- .489 (71 points higher)
    OPS- .873 (89 points higher)


    Advanced

    wOBA- .377 (32 points higher)
    wRC+ (Runs Created/Park adjusted) 127 (13 higher)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    8,814
    vCash
    1500
    Pretty obviously JD Drew.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Waterloo
    Posts
    9,076
    vCash
    1500
    Drew...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    633
    vCash
    1500
    I like this thread. Its interesting. However, I would still rather have 9 Ichiros. But good observation. There are more stats than just those that Ichiro leads in

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    28,327
    vCash
    1500
    i'm not that up to date on some of these saber stats but does wRC factor in the speed..

    When you have 9 Ichiros in your lineup, a lot of those singles (leading to the low slugging) end up being doubles with the stolen base ability

    props to vick27m

    "Art was my first major in college but it was too hard, so I majored in math"
    Ron Artest

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    768
    vCash
    1500
    Ichiro because Drew would get a hangnail or his period would hit or something and he wouldn't be able to go.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    37,633
    vCash
    1000
    Lol, it's Drew easily.

    If all we are talking about is these two as hitters, it's easily J.D. Drew, he crushes Ichiro.

    J.D. Drew created 1003 runs in 6153 career PA, Ichiro has created 1152 in 8444 PA

    Know how bad of a hitter Drew would have to be to only created 149 more runs in his next 2300 PA? Horrible.

    Their .377 wOBA to .345 should tell you everything you need to know.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    37,633
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by bomber0104 View Post
    i'm not that up to date on some of these saber stats but does wRC factor in the speed..

    When you have 9 Ichiros in your lineup, a lot of those singles (leading to the low slugging) end up being doubles with the stolen base ability
    He was only asking about these two as hitters. Their stolen base ability has nothing to do with their hitting abilities.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,435
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    Lol, it's Drew easily.

    If all we are talking about is these two as hitters, it's easily J.D. Drew, he crushes Ichiro.

    J.D. Drew created 1003 runs in 6153 career PA, Ichiro has created 1152 in 8444 PA

    Know how bad of a hitter Drew would have to be to only created 149 more runs in his next 2300 PA? Horrible.

    Their .377 wOBA to .345 should tell you everything you need to know.
    Quick question..Maybe you'll have an answer...


    Why do some people STILL judge a hitter based largely on outdated methods such as Batting AVG/Total hits ect?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    37,633
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos_Sports4Life View Post
    Quick question..Maybe you'll have an answer...


    Why do some people STILL judge a hitter based largely on outdated methods such as Batting AVG/Total hits ect?
    Because they don't know any better?

    That's my assumption at least.

    It's usually people that haven't taken a lot of time to try to understand the more in depth methods of offensive analytics.

    Every single person I have ever explained them to that had any interest in learning anything new have easily understood their value and it made sense to them. It didn't mean they could recite them or could explain them back, but understood the premise and quickly understand that batting average/total hits is....well as useless as RBI's and Wins for pitchers. It's usually just that people don't know enough about the information/stats to answer. Either that, or they choose to ignore it out of spite for hating sabr-metrics because it's cool to hate things.

    I chalk it up to most people don't know enough about offensive analytics though, and there is nothing wrong with that. Especially if you don't want to be a very in depth baseball fan, which most people don't seem to want to be in the first place.

    It's pretty easy to explain how J.D. Drew has been the better hitter compared to Ichiro over the years, even though he has less plate appearances.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,435
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    Because they don't know any better?

    That's my assumption at least.

    It's usually people that haven't taken a lot of time to try to understand the more in depth methods of offensive analytics.

    Every single person I have ever explained them to that had any interest in learning anything new have easily understood their value and it made sense to them. It didn't mean they could recite them or could explain them back, but understood the premise and quickly understand that batting average/total hits is....well as useless as RBI's and Wins for pitchers. It's usually just that people don't know enough about the information/stats to answer. Either that, or they choose to ignore it out of spite for hating sabr-metrics because it's cool to hate things.

    I chalk it up to most people don't know enough about offensive analytics though, and there is nothing wrong with that. Especially if you don't want to be a very in depth baseball fan, which most people don't seem to want to be in the first place.

    It's pretty easy to explain how J.D. Drew has been the better hitter compared to Ichiro over the years, even though he has less plate appearances.
    The problem is, These people THINK they know what they are talking about and for some reason are hardwired into thinking batting AVG is extremely important when in fact it has minimal impact..

    They keep telling me i need to "prove it"..I just don't know where there is concrete proof..Maybe there's some links? No idea

    A lot of the problem imo is ESPN has made the masses of casual fans even less educated. ESPN doesn't obviously talk about advanced stats much and are still more so geared towards traditional stats that have little to no meaning.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    37,633
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos_Sports4Life View Post
    The problem is, These people THINK they know what they are talking about and for some reason are hardwired into thinking batting AVG is extremely important when in fact it has minimal impact..

    They keep telling me i need to "prove it"..I just don't know where there is concrete proof..Maybe there's some links? No idea

    A lot of the problem imo is ESPN has made the masses of casual fans even less educated. ESPN doesn't obviously talk about advanced stats much and are still more so geared towards traditional stats that have little to no meaning.
    Well batting averages flaws are pretty easy to point out.


    "When a hitter draws a walk, batting average acts like nothing happened. But OBP not only shows the players batting average, but also gives them credit for every time they reached base, regardless if it was a hit by pitch, a walk, etc"

    Everyone can understand very quickly why OBP would be more valuable than AVG. It tells more.

    But Slugging percentage also tells you more than batting average because a single isn't worth the same as a home run, or a double, or a triple. And a double isn't worth as much as a home run, or a triple. But batting average treats each extra base hit as the exact same as a single. And we know that isn't right. Because clearly a home run is worth more to a team than a single.

    These are both pretty damn obvious, and anyone that choses to ignore this....is well....woefully ignorant. This is information that should be pretty well known by now to anyone that follows baseball even just a little. Even my 8 year old nephew knows the difference (it was discussed this weekend).

    And we also know that OBP and Slugging have their flaws as well, but not to the extent of batting average. But that's a lot more typing than I feel like doing now, and I know that you (Bos Sports4Life) already know all of it

    ESPN grabs the attention of the casual baseball fan. Or the fan that likes other sports maybe more than baseball. They give you the brief information about whatever is topical in baseball at that time, and that's it. And most people, that is really all they want.

    I have seen some advanced stats displayed on ESPN, but I know it isn't shown much, or even talked about much.
    Last edited by Jeffy25; 07-16-2012 at 02:04 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,435
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffy25 View Post
    Well batting averages flaws are pretty easy to point out.


    "When a hitter draws a walk, batting average acts like nothing happened. But OBP not only shows the players batting average, but also gives them credit for every time they reached base, regardless if it was a hit by pitch, a walk, etc"

    Everyone can understand very quickly why OBP would be more valuable than AVG. It tells more.

    But Slugging percentage also tells you more than batting average because a single isn't worth the same as a home run, or a double, or a triple. And a double isn't worth as much as a home run, or a triple. But batting average treats each extra base hit as the exact same as a single. And we know that isn't right. Because clearly a home run is worth more to a team than a single.

    These are both pretty damn obvious, and anyone that choses to ignore this....is well....woefully ignorant. This is information that should be pretty well known by now to anyone that follows baseball even just a little. Even my 8 year old nephew knows the difference (it was discussed this weekend).

    And we also know that OBP and Slugging have their flaws as well, but not to the extent of batting average. But that's a lot more typing than I feel like doing now, and I know that you (Bos Sports4Life) already know all of it

    ESPN grabs the attention of the casual baseball fan. Or the fan that likes other sports maybe more than baseball. They give you the brief information about whatever is topical in baseball at that time, and that's it. And most people, that is really all they want.

    I have seen some advanced stats displayed on ESPN, but I know it isn't shown much, or even talked about much.

    1 last quick question, Ive heard several advaned stats are 95%+ accurate. Do you know if these stats are judged against past games?

    Like do they plug in a teams AVG/OBP/SLG/wOBA/RC+ ect ect and it spits out a run total that is 95%+ accurate to the runs the teams really did score?

    I was just curious how they meaure the accuracy of these stats (even though I obviously believe it is)
    Last edited by Bos_Sports4Life; 07-16-2012 at 02:10 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    37,633
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos_Sports4Life View Post
    1 last quick question, Ive heard several advaned stats are 95%+ accurate. Do you know if these stats are judged against past games?

    Like do they plug in a teams AVG/OBP/SLG/wOBA/RC+ ect ect and it spits out a run total that is 95%+ accurate to the runs the teams really did score?

    I was just curious how they meaure the accuracy of these stats (even though I obviously believe it is)
    Sure. It's usually very high, the only thing that distracts from it is a teams LOB% and the amount of double plays they hit into.

    Otherwise it should land right on.

    If you gave me a teams AVG/OBP/SLG/wOBA/ and wRC+ and the team name (stadium and DH and PA reasons why) I could tell you within 5% the teams total runs. The only factor left over would be the teams Left On Base Percentage (did they strand a ton of guys or hit awesome with 2 outs?) and the amount of double plays they hit into. That's going to erase some of those base hits and walks over the course of the season.

    It's pretty damn accurate. Offensive statistics are easily the most advanced and accurate of all sabr-metrics in current use. Pitching metrics is a pretty distant second because it's difficult to judge how much the pitcher really controls and how much of it is between the ears etc. And then defensive metrics are still in the Iron Age comparatively. They are really really far behind but have been progressing pretty well the last 3 years.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    16,211
    vCash
    1500
    Just curious but how do you compare Career stats against another one when one has had less seasons? I get that you have to maintain that but wouldn't Ichiro have better stats say if he started at an earlier age like 22?? I realize his slugging wouldn't be better because he doesn't really have the type of swing to drive the ball.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •