Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    36,425

    Trade #93 - New York Knicks / Denver Nuggets

    Nuggets Receive:

    Jeremy Lin S&T on a max contract,

    Year 1: $13,674,480
    Year 2: $14,700,066(PO)
    Year 3: $15,802,571 (PO)
    Year 4: $16,987,764(PO)
    Year 5: $18,261,846
    Total: $79,426,727

    Vince Carter- $3,000,000


    Knicks Receive:

    Avery Bradley ($1,630,800)
    Moe Harkless ($1,134,500)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    29,905
    Unless your trading Lawson why in the world would Denver even do this


    #TreyBurke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Staten island Ny
    Posts
    14,717
    WOW love for the knicks
    Sim League Clippers

    The future Kevin Love James Harden,JaVale McGee and Mike Conley
    2005 Record 59-23 Result- Lost WCF
    2006- 59-23 Result-Lost in the 2nd round
    2007- 48-34 1st round exit :
    2008 34-48,
    2009- the full rebuild starts

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Boogie Down Bronx!
    Posts
    7,444
    Bradley wasn't going to make or break my team.. tough choice but it is what it is. This sets up some bigger moves to be done later if need be. And my depth is getting deep right now!

    I knew I would get some backlash for trading Bradley.. but it's whatever.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Toronto, On
    Posts
    29,905
    Its not trading Bradley its your backcourt is
    Ty Lawson and Jeremy Linn, your going to get absolutely pummeled if you keep that in tact.

    But if your trading Lawson then makes sense.

    Also if you wanted to max a SG why not a terry or billups or someone?? Trading Lawson would be taking a big step back IMO


    #TreyBurke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Boogie Down Bronx!
    Posts
    7,444
    Quote Originally Posted by eaglesbaby4lyfe View Post
    Its not trading Bradley its your backcourt is
    Ty Lawson and Jeremy Linn, your going to get absolutely pummeled if you keep that in tact.

    But if your trading Lawson then makes sense.

    Also if you wanted to max a SG why not a terry or billups or someone?? Trading Lawson would be taking a big step back IMO
    I understand what you're saying... I see that. I didn't make this move without thinking ahead. I have some moves that will be done. It's just one step of many. But trust me I see your concern.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    19,335
    I'll take Lawson
    Quote Originally Posted by macc View Post
    Would I take Harden over Rose? I can't answere that question honestly because I would like to see Harden as a #1 option first. Rose can def score, and is a good defender, but he's not a great passer (something you want out of your pg). In saying that I don't see a Rose lead Chicago doing anything in the playoffs. They won't get by Miami and they'll be lucky if they can beat Boston. So since you're so high on Rose, I don't see him doing any damage at all come playoff time.



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    classified
    Posts
    10,507
    isn't Lin's max $5m in the first year
    LET'S GO KNICKS


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Boogie Down Bronx!
    Posts
    7,444
    Quote Originally Posted by NYKalltheway View Post
    isn't Lin's max $5m in the first year
    I thought the same thing...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,031
    Quote Originally Posted by NYKalltheway View Post
    isn't Lin's max $5m in the first year
    Catfish says @#$% your rules and the constraints of society



    (If we were following the rules lins Max would be 5, but we are pretending there is no early bird free agents)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •